[DISCUSS] Apache NiFi MiNiFi C++ 0.6.0

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[DISCUSS] Apache NiFi MiNiFi C++ 0.6.0

Marc Parisi
Hello everyone,
  I wanted to discuss releasing Apache NiFi MiNiFi C++ 0.6.0 in the coming
week or two. We have some exciting new features and even more exciting bug
fixes.

   This release will see the growth of a sub-component called nanofi, which
will be an easily consumable library that enables integration within
existing applications. Additionally, we've introduced a new C2 CoAP
protocol, the ability to write and execute custom native Python processors
in flows, and a JNI link that enables running Java processors from within a
much smaller resource footprint in MiNiFI C++ -- closing gaps and enabling
feature sets. This release will also see the introduction of Windows builds
and various fixes that will improve the user experience.

   As with all releases, these feature sets can be customized for use
cases/deployments.

   If everyone is amenable to a release, I will RM unless anyone would like
to take those duties.

   Best Regards,
   Marc Parisi
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache NiFi MiNiFi C++ 0.6.0

Kevin Doran-2
Wow, that list of features is impressive, and certainly I agree it
would be great to get them all in a release. Thanks for kicking it
off, Marc!

Regards,
Kevin

On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 8:41 AM Marc Parisi <[hidden email]> wrote:

>
> Hello everyone,
>   I wanted to discuss releasing Apache NiFi MiNiFi C++ 0.6.0 in the coming
> week or two. We have some exciting new features and even more exciting bug
> fixes.
>
>    This release will see the growth of a sub-component called nanofi, which
> will be an easily consumable library that enables integration within
> existing applications. Additionally, we've introduced a new C2 CoAP
> protocol, the ability to write and execute custom native Python processors
> in flows, and a JNI link that enables running Java processors from within a
> much smaller resource footprint in MiNiFI C++ -- closing gaps and enabling
> feature sets. This release will also see the introduction of Windows builds
> and various fixes that will improve the user experience.
>
>    As with all releases, these feature sets can be customized for use
> cases/deployments.
>
>    If everyone is amenable to a release, I will RM unless anyone would like
> to take those duties.
>
>    Best Regards,
>    Marc Parisi
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache NiFi MiNiFi C++ 0.6.0

Aldrin Piri
Sounds great to me.  Definitely have put a lot of great advances since our
last release in both features and robustness.  Looking forward to it and
thanks for volunteering for RM duties.

On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 9:40 AM Kevin Doran <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Wow, that list of features is impressive, and certainly I agree it
> would be great to get them all in a release. Thanks for kicking it
> off, Marc!
>
> Regards,
> Kevin
>
> On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 8:41 AM Marc Parisi <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> > Hello everyone,
> >   I wanted to discuss releasing Apache NiFi MiNiFi C++ 0.6.0 in the
> coming
> > week or two. We have some exciting new features and even more exciting
> bug
> > fixes.
> >
> >    This release will see the growth of a sub-component called nanofi,
> which
> > will be an easily consumable library that enables integration within
> > existing applications. Additionally, we've introduced a new C2 CoAP
> > protocol, the ability to write and execute custom native Python
> processors
> > in flows, and a JNI link that enables running Java processors from
> within a
> > much smaller resource footprint in MiNiFI C++ -- closing gaps and
> enabling
> > feature sets. This release will also see the introduction of Windows
> builds
> > and various fixes that will improve the user experience.
> >
> >    As with all releases, these feature sets can be customized for use
> > cases/deployments.
> >
> >    If everyone is amenable to a release, I will RM unless anyone would
> like
> > to take those duties.
> >
> >    Best Regards,
> >    Marc Parisi
>