[DISCUSS] Early, voluntary relocation to GitBox

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
23 messages Options
12
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[DISCUSS] Early, voluntary relocation to GitBox

Aldrin Piri
Hey folks,

Daniel Gruno sent an email to the dev list about the deprecation of our
git-wip repositories [1] (these are the canonical repos that committers
push changes to and are currently mirrored to GitHub) and transitioning to
GitBox [2].

As highlighted in that email, this will not be an optional change, only in
when and how it happens.  There was a previous discussion over this topic
[3] where it was generally well received but I think some of the logistics
were never mapped out and thus the actual request to do so was never
executed.

I am proposing we volunteer for the early relocation.  The process looks to
be fairly straightforward and should ultimately only result in requiring
our contributors to add/replace their original git-wip based remotes.

If folks are in favor, I am happy to file the requisite INFRA ticket and
provide the associated communication/docs to the community to make this
happen.  Again, this is only about making the choice to perform this
migration now, in a coordinated manner, in lieu of the mass migration that
would happen later.

From a project management standpoint, I think it is a nice bit of
functionality that lets us better curate our open PRs and, given my prior
interest in the subject, would like to see it happen.

--aldrin

[1]
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/8247bb17671d6131b1d7a646b4c018b21aac390c4f627d8fb1f421b2@%3Cdev.nifi.apache.org%3E
[2] https://gitbox.apache.org/
[3]
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/de5e103994f356b1b8a572410938eef44af8cb352210e35305c04bc9@%3Cdev.nifi.apache.org%3E
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [DISCUSS] Early, voluntary relocation to GitBox

Andy LoPresto-2
+1.

Andy LoPresto
[hidden email]
[hidden email]
PGP Fingerprint: 70EC B3E5 98A6 5A3F D3C4  BACE 3C6E F65B 2F7D EF69

> On Dec 7, 2018, at 11:11 AM, Aldrin Piri <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Hey folks,
>
> Daniel Gruno sent an email to the dev list about the deprecation of our
> git-wip repositories [1] (these are the canonical repos that committers
> push changes to and are currently mirrored to GitHub) and transitioning to
> GitBox [2].
>
> As highlighted in that email, this will not be an optional change, only in
> when and how it happens.  There was a previous discussion over this topic
> [3] where it was generally well received but I think some of the logistics
> were never mapped out and thus the actual request to do so was never
> executed.
>
> I am proposing we volunteer for the early relocation.  The process looks to
> be fairly straightforward and should ultimately only result in requiring
> our contributors to add/replace their original git-wip based remotes.
>
> If folks are in favor, I am happy to file the requisite INFRA ticket and
> provide the associated communication/docs to the community to make this
> happen.  Again, this is only about making the choice to perform this
> migration now, in a coordinated manner, in lieu of the mass migration that
> would happen later.
>
> From a project management standpoint, I think it is a nice bit of
> functionality that lets us better curate our open PRs and, given my prior
> interest in the subject, would like to see it happen.
>
> --aldrin
>
> [1]
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/8247bb17671d6131b1d7a646b4c018b21aac390c4f627d8fb1f421b2@%3Cdev.nifi.apache.org%3E
> [2] https://gitbox.apache.org/
> [3]
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/de5e103994f356b1b8a572410938eef44af8cb352210e35305c04bc9@%3Cdev.nifi.apache.org%3E

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [DISCUSS] Early, voluntary relocation to GitBox

Kevin Doran
+1

On 12/7/18, 15:17, "Andy LoPresto" <[hidden email]> wrote:

    +1.
   
    Andy LoPresto
    [hidden email]
    [hidden email]
    PGP Fingerprint: 70EC B3E5 98A6 5A3F D3C4  BACE 3C6E F65B 2F7D EF69
   
    > On Dec 7, 2018, at 11:11 AM, Aldrin Piri <[hidden email]> wrote:
    >
    > Hey folks,
    >
    > Daniel Gruno sent an email to the dev list about the deprecation of our
    > git-wip repositories [1] (these are the canonical repos that committers
    > push changes to and are currently mirrored to GitHub) and transitioning to
    > GitBox [2].
    >
    > As highlighted in that email, this will not be an optional change, only in
    > when and how it happens.  There was a previous discussion over this topic
    > [3] where it was generally well received but I think some of the logistics
    > were never mapped out and thus the actual request to do so was never
    > executed.
    >
    > I am proposing we volunteer for the early relocation.  The process looks to
    > be fairly straightforward and should ultimately only result in requiring
    > our contributors to add/replace their original git-wip based remotes.
    >
    > If folks are in favor, I am happy to file the requisite INFRA ticket and
    > provide the associated communication/docs to the community to make this
    > happen.  Again, this is only about making the choice to perform this
    > migration now, in a coordinated manner, in lieu of the mass migration that
    > would happen later.
    >
    > From a project management standpoint, I think it is a nice bit of
    > functionality that lets us better curate our open PRs and, given my prior
    > interest in the subject, would like to see it happen.
    >
    > --aldrin
    >
    > [1]
    > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/8247bb17671d6131b1d7a646b4c018b21aac390c4f627d8fb1f421b2@%3Cdev.nifi.apache.org%3E
    > [2] https://gitbox.apache.org/
    > [3]
    > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/de5e103994f356b1b8a572410938eef44af8cb352210e35305c04bc9@%3Cdev.nifi.apache.org%3E
   
   
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [DISCUSS] Early, voluntary relocation to GitBox

James Wing
+1, thanks for volunteering.

> On Dec 7, 2018, at 13:39, Kevin Doran <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On 12/7/18, 15:17, "Andy LoPresto" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>    +1.
>
>    Andy LoPresto
>    [hidden email]
>    [hidden email]
>    PGP Fingerprint: 70EC B3E5 98A6 5A3F D3C4  BACE 3C6E F65B 2F7D EF69
>
>> On Dec 7, 2018, at 11:11 AM, Aldrin Piri <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> Hey folks,
>>
>> Daniel Gruno sent an email to the dev list about the deprecation of our
>> git-wip repositories [1] (these are the canonical repos that committers
>> push changes to and are currently mirrored to GitHub) and transitioning to
>> GitBox [2].
>>
>> As highlighted in that email, this will not be an optional change, only in
>> when and how it happens.  There was a previous discussion over this topic
>> [3] where it was generally well received but I think some of the logistics
>> were never mapped out and thus the actual request to do so was never
>> executed.
>>
>> I am proposing we volunteer for the early relocation.  The process looks to
>> be fairly straightforward and should ultimately only result in requiring
>> our contributors to add/replace their original git-wip based remotes.
>>
>> If folks are in favor, I am happy to file the requisite INFRA ticket and
>> provide the associated communication/docs to the community to make this
>> happen.  Again, this is only about making the choice to perform this
>> migration now, in a coordinated manner, in lieu of the mass migration that
>> would happen later.
>>
>> From a project management standpoint, I think it is a nice bit of
>> functionality that lets us better curate our open PRs and, given my prior
>> interest in the subject, would like to see it happen.
>>
>> --aldrin
>>
>> [1]
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/8247bb17671d6131b1d7a646b4c018b21aac390c4f627d8fb1f421b2@%3Cdev.nifi.apache.org%3E
>> [2] https://gitbox.apache.org/
>> [3]
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/de5e103994f356b1b8a572410938eef44af8cb352210e35305c04bc9@%3Cdev.nifi.apache.org%3E
>
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [DISCUSS] Early, voluntary relocation to GitBox

Sivaprasanna Sethuraman
+1 (non-binding)

I’m in. Thanks for doing it, Aldrin.


On Sat, 8 Dec 2018 at 7:32 AM, James Wing <[hidden email]> wrote:

> +1, thanks for volunteering.
>
> > On Dec 7, 2018, at 13:39, Kevin Doran <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> > +1
> >
> > On 12/7/18, 15:17, "Andy LoPresto" <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> >    +1.
> >
> >    Andy LoPresto
> >    [hidden email]
> >    [hidden email]
> >    PGP Fingerprint: 70EC B3E5 98A6 5A3F D3C4  BACE 3C6E F65B 2F7D EF69
> >
> >> On Dec 7, 2018, at 11:11 AM, Aldrin Piri <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hey folks,
> >>
> >> Daniel Gruno sent an email to the dev list about the deprecation of our
> >> git-wip repositories [1] (these are the canonical repos that committers
> >> push changes to and are currently mirrored to GitHub) and transitioning
> to
> >> GitBox [2].
> >>
> >> As highlighted in that email, this will not be an optional change, only
> in
> >> when and how it happens.  There was a previous discussion over this
> topic
> >> [3] where it was generally well received but I think some of the
> logistics
> >> were never mapped out and thus the actual request to do so was never
> >> executed.
> >>
> >> I am proposing we volunteer for the early relocation.  The process
> looks to
> >> be fairly straightforward and should ultimately only result in requiring
> >> our contributors to add/replace their original git-wip based remotes.
> >>
> >> If folks are in favor, I am happy to file the requisite INFRA ticket and
> >> provide the associated communication/docs to the community to make this
> >> happen.  Again, this is only about making the choice to perform this
> >> migration now, in a coordinated manner, in lieu of the mass migration
> that
> >> would happen later.
> >>
> >> From a project management standpoint, I think it is a nice bit of
> >> functionality that lets us better curate our open PRs and, given my
> prior
> >> interest in the subject, would like to see it happen.
> >>
> >> --aldrin
> >>
> >> [1]
> >>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/8247bb17671d6131b1d7a646b4c018b21aac390c4f627d8fb1f421b2@%3Cdev.nifi.apache.org%3E
> >> [2] https://gitbox.apache.org/
> >> [3]
> >>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/de5e103994f356b1b8a572410938eef44af8cb352210e35305c04bc9@%3Cdev.nifi.apache.org%3E
> >
> >
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [DISCUSS] Early, voluntary relocation to GitBox

Mike Thomsen
+1

On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 9:08 PM Sivaprasanna <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> I’m in. Thanks for doing it, Aldrin.
>
>
> On Sat, 8 Dec 2018 at 7:32 AM, James Wing <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> > +1, thanks for volunteering.
> >
> > > On Dec 7, 2018, at 13:39, Kevin Doran <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On 12/7/18, 15:17, "Andy LoPresto" <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > >
> > >    +1.
> > >
> > >    Andy LoPresto
> > >    [hidden email]
> > >    [hidden email]
> > >    PGP Fingerprint: 70EC B3E5 98A6 5A3F D3C4  BACE 3C6E F65B 2F7D EF69
> > >
> > >> On Dec 7, 2018, at 11:11 AM, Aldrin Piri <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hey folks,
> > >>
> > >> Daniel Gruno sent an email to the dev list about the deprecation of
> our
> > >> git-wip repositories [1] (these are the canonical repos that
> committers
> > >> push changes to and are currently mirrored to GitHub) and
> transitioning
> > to
> > >> GitBox [2].
> > >>
> > >> As highlighted in that email, this will not be an optional change,
> only
> > in
> > >> when and how it happens.  There was a previous discussion over this
> > topic
> > >> [3] where it was generally well received but I think some of the
> > logistics
> > >> were never mapped out and thus the actual request to do so was never
> > >> executed.
> > >>
> > >> I am proposing we volunteer for the early relocation.  The process
> > looks to
> > >> be fairly straightforward and should ultimately only result in
> requiring
> > >> our contributors to add/replace their original git-wip based remotes.
> > >>
> > >> If folks are in favor, I am happy to file the requisite INFRA ticket
> and
> > >> provide the associated communication/docs to the community to make
> this
> > >> happen.  Again, this is only about making the choice to perform this
> > >> migration now, in a coordinated manner, in lieu of the mass migration
> > that
> > >> would happen later.
> > >>
> > >> From a project management standpoint, I think it is a nice bit of
> > >> functionality that lets us better curate our open PRs and, given my
> > prior
> > >> interest in the subject, would like to see it happen.
> > >>
> > >> --aldrin
> > >>
> > >> [1]
> > >>
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/8247bb17671d6131b1d7a646b4c018b21aac390c4f627d8fb1f421b2@%3Cdev.nifi.apache.org%3E
> > >> [2] https://gitbox.apache.org/
> > >> [3]
> > >>
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/de5e103994f356b1b8a572410938eef44af8cb352210e35305c04bc9@%3Cdev.nifi.apache.org%3E
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [DISCUSS] Early, voluntary relocation to GitBox

trkurc
Administrator
+1, sounds like a great idea

On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 7:44 AM Mike Thomsen <[hidden email]> wrote:

> +1
>
> On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 9:08 PM Sivaprasanna <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > I’m in. Thanks for doing it, Aldrin.
> >
> >
> > On Sat, 8 Dec 2018 at 7:32 AM, James Wing <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> > > +1, thanks for volunteering.
> > >
> > > > On Dec 7, 2018, at 13:39, Kevin Doran <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > On 12/7/18, 15:17, "Andy LoPresto" <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >    +1.
> > > >
> > > >    Andy LoPresto
> > > >    [hidden email]
> > > >    [hidden email]
> > > >    PGP Fingerprint: 70EC B3E5 98A6 5A3F D3C4  BACE 3C6E F65B 2F7D
> EF69
> > > >
> > > >> On Dec 7, 2018, at 11:11 AM, Aldrin Piri <[hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> Hey folks,
> > > >>
> > > >> Daniel Gruno sent an email to the dev list about the deprecation of
> > our
> > > >> git-wip repositories [1] (these are the canonical repos that
> > committers
> > > >> push changes to and are currently mirrored to GitHub) and
> > transitioning
> > > to
> > > >> GitBox [2].
> > > >>
> > > >> As highlighted in that email, this will not be an optional change,
> > only
> > > in
> > > >> when and how it happens.  There was a previous discussion over this
> > > topic
> > > >> [3] where it was generally well received but I think some of the
> > > logistics
> > > >> were never mapped out and thus the actual request to do so was never
> > > >> executed.
> > > >>
> > > >> I am proposing we volunteer for the early relocation.  The process
> > > looks to
> > > >> be fairly straightforward and should ultimately only result in
> > requiring
> > > >> our contributors to add/replace their original git-wip based
> remotes.
> > > >>
> > > >> If folks are in favor, I am happy to file the requisite INFRA ticket
> > and
> > > >> provide the associated communication/docs to the community to make
> > this
> > > >> happen.  Again, this is only about making the choice to perform this
> > > >> migration now, in a coordinated manner, in lieu of the mass
> migration
> > > that
> > > >> would happen later.
> > > >>
> > > >> From a project management standpoint, I think it is a nice bit of
> > > >> functionality that lets us better curate our open PRs and, given my
> > > prior
> > > >> interest in the subject, would like to see it happen.
> > > >>
> > > >> --aldrin
> > > >>
> > > >> [1]
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/8247bb17671d6131b1d7a646b4c018b21aac390c4f627d8fb1f421b2@%3Cdev.nifi.apache.org%3E
> > > >> [2] https://gitbox.apache.org/
> > > >> [3]
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/de5e103994f356b1b8a572410938eef44af8cb352210e35305c04bc9@%3Cdev.nifi.apache.org%3E
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [DISCUSS] Early, voluntary relocation to GitBox

Aldrin Piri
Thanks to those of you that responded.

I think my tentative plan is to give this a few more days to see if there
are any strong objections.  Otherwise, I'll look to file the ticket around
midweek and then look to begin the process toward the end of next week to
hopefully minimize disruptions.  Thanks again!

On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 12:09 PM Tony Kurc <[hidden email]> wrote:

> +1, sounds like a great idea
>
> On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 7:44 AM Mike Thomsen <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 9:08 PM Sivaprasanna <[hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > > I’m in. Thanks for doing it, Aldrin.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sat, 8 Dec 2018 at 7:32 AM, James Wing <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1, thanks for volunteering.
> > > >
> > > > > On Dec 7, 2018, at 13:39, Kevin Doran <[hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > +1
> > > > >
> > > > > On 12/7/18, 15:17, "Andy LoPresto" <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >    +1.
> > > > >
> > > > >    Andy LoPresto
> > > > >    [hidden email]
> > > > >    [hidden email]
> > > > >    PGP Fingerprint: 70EC B3E5 98A6 5A3F D3C4  BACE 3C6E F65B 2F7D
> > EF69
> > > > >
> > > > >> On Dec 7, 2018, at 11:11 AM, Aldrin Piri <[hidden email]>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Hey folks,
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Daniel Gruno sent an email to the dev list about the deprecation
> of
> > > our
> > > > >> git-wip repositories [1] (these are the canonical repos that
> > > committers
> > > > >> push changes to and are currently mirrored to GitHub) and
> > > transitioning
> > > > to
> > > > >> GitBox [2].
> > > > >>
> > > > >> As highlighted in that email, this will not be an optional change,
> > > only
> > > > in
> > > > >> when and how it happens.  There was a previous discussion over
> this
> > > > topic
> > > > >> [3] where it was generally well received but I think some of the
> > > > logistics
> > > > >> were never mapped out and thus the actual request to do so was
> never
> > > > >> executed.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> I am proposing we volunteer for the early relocation.  The process
> > > > looks to
> > > > >> be fairly straightforward and should ultimately only result in
> > > requiring
> > > > >> our contributors to add/replace their original git-wip based
> > remotes.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> If folks are in favor, I am happy to file the requisite INFRA
> ticket
> > > and
> > > > >> provide the associated communication/docs to the community to make
> > > this
> > > > >> happen.  Again, this is only about making the choice to perform
> this
> > > > >> migration now, in a coordinated manner, in lieu of the mass
> > migration
> > > > that
> > > > >> would happen later.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> From a project management standpoint, I think it is a nice bit of
> > > > >> functionality that lets us better curate our open PRs and, given
> my
> > > > prior
> > > > >> interest in the subject, would like to see it happen.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> --aldrin
> > > > >>
> > > > >> [1]
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/8247bb17671d6131b1d7a646b4c018b21aac390c4f627d8fb1f421b2@%3Cdev.nifi.apache.org%3E
> > > > >> [2] https://gitbox.apache.org/
> > > > >> [3]
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/de5e103994f356b1b8a572410938eef44af8cb352210e35305c04bc9@%3Cdev.nifi.apache.org%3E
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [DISCUSS] Early, voluntary relocation to GitBox

Arpad Boda
+1 (for being the guinea pig __ )

On 09/12/2018, 04:01, "Aldrin Piri" <[hidden email]> wrote:

    Thanks to those of you that responded.
   
    I think my tentative plan is to give this a few more days to see if there
    are any strong objections.  Otherwise, I'll look to file the ticket around
    midweek and then look to begin the process toward the end of next week to
    hopefully minimize disruptions.  Thanks again!
   
    On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 12:09 PM Tony Kurc <[hidden email]> wrote:
   
    > +1, sounds like a great idea
    >
    > On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 7:44 AM Mike Thomsen <[hidden email]>
    > wrote:
    >
    > > +1
    > >
    > > On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 9:08 PM Sivaprasanna <[hidden email]>
    > > wrote:
    > >
    > > > +1 (non-binding)
    > > >
    > > > I’m in. Thanks for doing it, Aldrin.
    > > >
    > > >
    > > > On Sat, 8 Dec 2018 at 7:32 AM, James Wing <[hidden email]> wrote:
    > > >
    > > > > +1, thanks for volunteering.
    > > > >
    > > > > > On Dec 7, 2018, at 13:39, Kevin Doran <[hidden email]>
    > > wrote:
    > > > > >
    > > > > > +1
    > > > > >
    > > > > > On 12/7/18, 15:17, "Andy LoPresto" <[hidden email]> wrote:
    > > > > >
    > > > > >    +1.
    > > > > >
    > > > > >    Andy LoPresto
    > > > > >    [hidden email]
    > > > > >    [hidden email]
    > > > > >    PGP Fingerprint: 70EC B3E5 98A6 5A3F D3C4  BACE 3C6E F65B 2F7D
    > > EF69
    > > > > >
    > > > > >> On Dec 7, 2018, at 11:11 AM, Aldrin Piri <[hidden email]>
    > > > wrote:
    > > > > >>
    > > > > >> Hey folks,
    > > > > >>
    > > > > >> Daniel Gruno sent an email to the dev list about the deprecation
    > of
    > > > our
    > > > > >> git-wip repositories [1] (these are the canonical repos that
    > > > committers
    > > > > >> push changes to and are currently mirrored to GitHub) and
    > > > transitioning
    > > > > to
    > > > > >> GitBox [2].
    > > > > >>
    > > > > >> As highlighted in that email, this will not be an optional change,
    > > > only
    > > > > in
    > > > > >> when and how it happens.  There was a previous discussion over
    > this
    > > > > topic
    > > > > >> [3] where it was generally well received but I think some of the
    > > > > logistics
    > > > > >> were never mapped out and thus the actual request to do so was
    > never
    > > > > >> executed.
    > > > > >>
    > > > > >> I am proposing we volunteer for the early relocation.  The process
    > > > > looks to
    > > > > >> be fairly straightforward and should ultimately only result in
    > > > requiring
    > > > > >> our contributors to add/replace their original git-wip based
    > > remotes.
    > > > > >>
    > > > > >> If folks are in favor, I am happy to file the requisite INFRA
    > ticket
    > > > and
    > > > > >> provide the associated communication/docs to the community to make
    > > > this
    > > > > >> happen.  Again, this is only about making the choice to perform
    > this
    > > > > >> migration now, in a coordinated manner, in lieu of the mass
    > > migration
    > > > > that
    > > > > >> would happen later.
    > > > > >>
    > > > > >> From a project management standpoint, I think it is a nice bit of
    > > > > >> functionality that lets us better curate our open PRs and, given
    > my
    > > > > prior
    > > > > >> interest in the subject, would like to see it happen.
    > > > > >>
    > > > > >> --aldrin
    > > > > >>
    > > > > >> [1]
    > > > > >>
    > > > >
    > > >
    > >
    > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/8247bb17671d6131b1d7a646b4c018b21aac390c4f627d8fb1f421b2@%3Cdev.nifi.apache.org%3E
    > > > > >> [2] https://gitbox.apache.org/
    > > > > >> [3]
    > > > > >>
    > > > >
    > > >
    > >
    > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/de5e103994f356b1b8a572410938eef44af8cb352210e35305c04bc9@%3Cdev.nifi.apache.org%3E
    > > > > >
    > > > > >
    > > > >
    > > >
    > >
    >
   

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [DISCUSS] Early, voluntary relocation to GitBox

Michael Moser
+1 from me, sounds great.


On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 4:07 AM Arpad Boda <[hidden email]> wrote:

> +1 (for being the guinea pig __ )
>
> On 09/12/2018, 04:01, "Aldrin Piri" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>     Thanks to those of you that responded.
>
>     I think my tentative plan is to give this a few more days to see if
> there
>     are any strong objections.  Otherwise, I'll look to file the ticket
> around
>     midweek and then look to begin the process toward the end of next week
> to
>     hopefully minimize disruptions.  Thanks again!
>
>     On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 12:09 PM Tony Kurc <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>     > +1, sounds like a great idea
>     >
>     > On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 7:44 AM Mike Thomsen <[hidden email]>
>     > wrote:
>     >
>     > > +1
>     > >
>     > > On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 9:08 PM Sivaprasanna <
> [hidden email]>
>     > > wrote:
>     > >
>     > > > +1 (non-binding)
>     > > >
>     > > > I’m in. Thanks for doing it, Aldrin.
>     > > >
>     > > >
>     > > > On Sat, 8 Dec 2018 at 7:32 AM, James Wing <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>     > > >
>     > > > > +1, thanks for volunteering.
>     > > > >
>     > > > > > On Dec 7, 2018, at 13:39, Kevin Doran <
> [hidden email]>
>     > > wrote:
>     > > > > >
>     > > > > > +1
>     > > > > >
>     > > > > > On 12/7/18, 15:17, "Andy LoPresto" <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>     > > > > >
>     > > > > >    +1.
>     > > > > >
>     > > > > >    Andy LoPresto
>     > > > > >    [hidden email]
>     > > > > >    [hidden email]
>     > > > > >    PGP Fingerprint: 70EC B3E5 98A6 5A3F D3C4  BACE 3C6E F65B
> 2F7D
>     > > EF69
>     > > > > >
>     > > > > >> On Dec 7, 2018, at 11:11 AM, Aldrin Piri <
> [hidden email]>
>     > > > wrote:
>     > > > > >>
>     > > > > >> Hey folks,
>     > > > > >>
>     > > > > >> Daniel Gruno sent an email to the dev list about the
> deprecation
>     > of
>     > > > our
>     > > > > >> git-wip repositories [1] (these are the canonical repos that
>     > > > committers
>     > > > > >> push changes to and are currently mirrored to GitHub) and
>     > > > transitioning
>     > > > > to
>     > > > > >> GitBox [2].
>     > > > > >>
>     > > > > >> As highlighted in that email, this will not be an optional
> change,
>     > > > only
>     > > > > in
>     > > > > >> when and how it happens.  There was a previous discussion
> over
>     > this
>     > > > > topic
>     > > > > >> [3] where it was generally well received but I think some
> of the
>     > > > > logistics
>     > > > > >> were never mapped out and thus the actual request to do so
> was
>     > never
>     > > > > >> executed.
>     > > > > >>
>     > > > > >> I am proposing we volunteer for the early relocation.  The
> process
>     > > > > looks to
>     > > > > >> be fairly straightforward and should ultimately only result
> in
>     > > > requiring
>     > > > > >> our contributors to add/replace their original git-wip based
>     > > remotes.
>     > > > > >>
>     > > > > >> If folks are in favor, I am happy to file the requisite
> INFRA
>     > ticket
>     > > > and
>     > > > > >> provide the associated communication/docs to the community
> to make
>     > > > this
>     > > > > >> happen.  Again, this is only about making the choice to
> perform
>     > this
>     > > > > >> migration now, in a coordinated manner, in lieu of the mass
>     > > migration
>     > > > > that
>     > > > > >> would happen later.
>     > > > > >>
>     > > > > >> From a project management standpoint, I think it is a nice
> bit of
>     > > > > >> functionality that lets us better curate our open PRs and,
> given
>     > my
>     > > > > prior
>     > > > > >> interest in the subject, would like to see it happen.
>     > > > > >>
>     > > > > >> --aldrin
>     > > > > >>
>     > > > > >> [1]
>     > > > > >>
>     > > > >
>     > > >
>     > >
>     >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/8247bb17671d6131b1d7a646b4c018b21aac390c4f627d8fb1f421b2@%3Cdev.nifi.apache.org%3E
>     > > > > >> [2] https://gitbox.apache.org/
>     > > > > >> [3]
>     > > > > >>
>     > > > >
>     > > >
>     > >
>     >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/de5e103994f356b1b8a572410938eef44af8cb352210e35305c04bc9@%3Cdev.nifi.apache.org%3E
>     > > > > >
>     > > > > >
>     > > > >
>     > > >
>     > >
>     >
>
>
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [DISCUSS] Early, voluntary relocation to GitBox

Laszlo Horvath
+1

On 10/12/2018, 15:22, "Michael Moser" <[hidden email]> wrote:

    +1 from me, sounds great.
   
   
    On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 4:07 AM Arpad Boda <[hidden email]> wrote:
   
    > +1 (for being the guinea pig __ )
    >
    > On 09/12/2018, 04:01, "Aldrin Piri" <[hidden email]> wrote:
    >
    >     Thanks to those of you that responded.
    >
    >     I think my tentative plan is to give this a few more days to see if
    > there
    >     are any strong objections.  Otherwise, I'll look to file the ticket
    > around
    >     midweek and then look to begin the process toward the end of next week
    > to
    >     hopefully minimize disruptions.  Thanks again!
    >
    >     On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 12:09 PM Tony Kurc <[hidden email]> wrote:
    >
    >     > +1, sounds like a great idea
    >     >
    >     > On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 7:44 AM Mike Thomsen <[hidden email]>
    >     > wrote:
    >     >
    >     > > +1
    >     > >
    >     > > On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 9:08 PM Sivaprasanna <
    > [hidden email]>
    >     > > wrote:
    >     > >
    >     > > > +1 (non-binding)
    >     > > >
    >     > > > I’m in. Thanks for doing it, Aldrin.
    >     > > >
    >     > > >
    >     > > > On Sat, 8 Dec 2018 at 7:32 AM, James Wing <[hidden email]>
    > wrote:
    >     > > >
    >     > > > > +1, thanks for volunteering.
    >     > > > >
    >     > > > > > On Dec 7, 2018, at 13:39, Kevin Doran <
    > [hidden email]>
    >     > > wrote:
    >     > > > > >
    >     > > > > > +1
    >     > > > > >
    >     > > > > > On 12/7/18, 15:17, "Andy LoPresto" <[hidden email]>
    > wrote:
    >     > > > > >
    >     > > > > >    +1.
    >     > > > > >
    >     > > > > >    Andy LoPresto
    >     > > > > >    [hidden email]
    >     > > > > >    [hidden email]
    >     > > > > >    PGP Fingerprint: 70EC B3E5 98A6 5A3F D3C4  BACE 3C6E F65B
    > 2F7D
    >     > > EF69
    >     > > > > >
    >     > > > > >> On Dec 7, 2018, at 11:11 AM, Aldrin Piri <
    > [hidden email]>
    >     > > > wrote:
    >     > > > > >>
    >     > > > > >> Hey folks,
    >     > > > > >>
    >     > > > > >> Daniel Gruno sent an email to the dev list about the
    > deprecation
    >     > of
    >     > > > our
    >     > > > > >> git-wip repositories [1] (these are the canonical repos that
    >     > > > committers
    >     > > > > >> push changes to and are currently mirrored to GitHub) and
    >     > > > transitioning
    >     > > > > to
    >     > > > > >> GitBox [2].
    >     > > > > >>
    >     > > > > >> As highlighted in that email, this will not be an optional
    > change,
    >     > > > only
    >     > > > > in
    >     > > > > >> when and how it happens.  There was a previous discussion
    > over
    >     > this
    >     > > > > topic
    >     > > > > >> [3] where it was generally well received but I think some
    > of the
    >     > > > > logistics
    >     > > > > >> were never mapped out and thus the actual request to do so
    > was
    >     > never
    >     > > > > >> executed.
    >     > > > > >>
    >     > > > > >> I am proposing we volunteer for the early relocation.  The
    > process
    >     > > > > looks to
    >     > > > > >> be fairly straightforward and should ultimately only result
    > in
    >     > > > requiring
    >     > > > > >> our contributors to add/replace their original git-wip based
    >     > > remotes.
    >     > > > > >>
    >     > > > > >> If folks are in favor, I am happy to file the requisite
    > INFRA
    >     > ticket
    >     > > > and
    >     > > > > >> provide the associated communication/docs to the community
    > to make
    >     > > > this
    >     > > > > >> happen.  Again, this is only about making the choice to
    > perform
    >     > this
    >     > > > > >> migration now, in a coordinated manner, in lieu of the mass
    >     > > migration
    >     > > > > that
    >     > > > > >> would happen later.
    >     > > > > >>
    >     > > > > >> From a project management standpoint, I think it is a nice
    > bit of
    >     > > > > >> functionality that lets us better curate our open PRs and,
    > given
    >     > my
    >     > > > > prior
    >     > > > > >> interest in the subject, would like to see it happen.
    >     > > > > >>
    >     > > > > >> --aldrin
    >     > > > > >>
    >     > > > > >> [1]
    >     > > > > >>
    >     > > > >
    >     > > >
    >     > >
    >     >
    > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/8247bb17671d6131b1d7a646b4c018b21aac390c4f627d8fb1f421b2@%3Cdev.nifi.apache.org%3E
    >     > > > > >> [2] https://gitbox.apache.org/
    >     > > > > >> [3]
    >     > > > > >>
    >     > > > >
    >     > > >
    >     > >
    >     >
    > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/de5e103994f356b1b8a572410938eef44af8cb352210e35305c04bc9@%3Cdev.nifi.apache.org%3E
    >     > > > > >
    >     > > > > >
    >     > > > >
    >     > > >
    >     > >
    >     >
    >
    >
    >
   

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [DISCUSS] Early, voluntary relocation to GitBox

Pierre Villard
+1 as well, should ease the contribution workflow.
Thanks for volunteering Aldrin.

Le lun. 10 déc. 2018 à 16:41, Laszlo Horvath <[hidden email]> a
écrit :

> +1
>
> On 10/12/2018, 15:22, "Michael Moser" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>     +1 from me, sounds great.
>
>
>     On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 4:07 AM Arpad Boda <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
>     > +1 (for being the guinea pig __ )
>     >
>     > On 09/12/2018, 04:01, "Aldrin Piri" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>     >
>     >     Thanks to those of you that responded.
>     >
>     >     I think my tentative plan is to give this a few more days to see
> if
>     > there
>     >     are any strong objections.  Otherwise, I'll look to file the
> ticket
>     > around
>     >     midweek and then look to begin the process toward the end of
> next week
>     > to
>     >     hopefully minimize disruptions.  Thanks again!
>     >
>     >     On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 12:09 PM Tony Kurc <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>     >
>     >     > +1, sounds like a great idea
>     >     >
>     >     > On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 7:44 AM Mike Thomsen <
> [hidden email]>
>     >     > wrote:
>     >     >
>     >     > > +1
>     >     > >
>     >     > > On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 9:08 PM Sivaprasanna <
>     > [hidden email]>
>     >     > > wrote:
>     >     > >
>     >     > > > +1 (non-binding)
>     >     > > >
>     >     > > > I’m in. Thanks for doing it, Aldrin.
>     >     > > >
>     >     > > >
>     >     > > > On Sat, 8 Dec 2018 at 7:32 AM, James Wing <
> [hidden email]>
>     > wrote:
>     >     > > >
>     >     > > > > +1, thanks for volunteering.
>     >     > > > >
>     >     > > > > > On Dec 7, 2018, at 13:39, Kevin Doran <
>     > [hidden email]>
>     >     > > wrote:
>     >     > > > > >
>     >     > > > > > +1
>     >     > > > > >
>     >     > > > > > On 12/7/18, 15:17, "Andy LoPresto" <
> [hidden email]>
>     > wrote:
>     >     > > > > >
>     >     > > > > >    +1.
>     >     > > > > >
>     >     > > > > >    Andy LoPresto
>     >     > > > > >    [hidden email]
>     >     > > > > >    [hidden email]
>     >     > > > > >    PGP Fingerprint: 70EC B3E5 98A6 5A3F D3C4  BACE
> 3C6E F65B
>     > 2F7D
>     >     > > EF69
>     >     > > > > >
>     >     > > > > >> On Dec 7, 2018, at 11:11 AM, Aldrin Piri <
>     > [hidden email]>
>     >     > > > wrote:
>     >     > > > > >>
>     >     > > > > >> Hey folks,
>     >     > > > > >>
>     >     > > > > >> Daniel Gruno sent an email to the dev list about the
>     > deprecation
>     >     > of
>     >     > > > our
>     >     > > > > >> git-wip repositories [1] (these are the canonical
> repos that
>     >     > > > committers
>     >     > > > > >> push changes to and are currently mirrored to GitHub)
> and
>     >     > > > transitioning
>     >     > > > > to
>     >     > > > > >> GitBox [2].
>     >     > > > > >>
>     >     > > > > >> As highlighted in that email, this will not be an
> optional
>     > change,
>     >     > > > only
>     >     > > > > in
>     >     > > > > >> when and how it happens.  There was a previous
> discussion
>     > over
>     >     > this
>     >     > > > > topic
>     >     > > > > >> [3] where it was generally well received but I think
> some
>     > of the
>     >     > > > > logistics
>     >     > > > > >> were never mapped out and thus the actual request to
> do so
>     > was
>     >     > never
>     >     > > > > >> executed.
>     >     > > > > >>
>     >     > > > > >> I am proposing we volunteer for the early
> relocation.  The
>     > process
>     >     > > > > looks to
>     >     > > > > >> be fairly straightforward and should ultimately only
> result
>     > in
>     >     > > > requiring
>     >     > > > > >> our contributors to add/replace their original
> git-wip based
>     >     > > remotes.
>     >     > > > > >>
>     >     > > > > >> If folks are in favor, I am happy to file the
> requisite
>     > INFRA
>     >     > ticket
>     >     > > > and
>     >     > > > > >> provide the associated communication/docs to the
> community
>     > to make
>     >     > > > this
>     >     > > > > >> happen.  Again, this is only about making the choice
> to
>     > perform
>     >     > this
>     >     > > > > >> migration now, in a coordinated manner, in lieu of
> the mass
>     >     > > migration
>     >     > > > > that
>     >     > > > > >> would happen later.
>     >     > > > > >>
>     >     > > > > >> From a project management standpoint, I think it is a
> nice
>     > bit of
>     >     > > > > >> functionality that lets us better curate our open PRs
> and,
>     > given
>     >     > my
>     >     > > > > prior
>     >     > > > > >> interest in the subject, would like to see it happen.
>     >     > > > > >>
>     >     > > > > >> --aldrin
>     >     > > > > >>
>     >     > > > > >> [1]
>     >     > > > > >>
>     >     > > > >
>     >     > > >
>     >     > >
>     >     >
>     >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/8247bb17671d6131b1d7a646b4c018b21aac390c4f627d8fb1f421b2@%3Cdev.nifi.apache.org%3E
>     >     > > > > >> [2] https://gitbox.apache.org/
>     >     > > > > >> [3]
>     >     > > > > >>
>     >     > > > >
>     >     > > >
>     >     > >
>     >     >
>     >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/de5e103994f356b1b8a572410938eef44af8cb352210e35305c04bc9@%3Cdev.nifi.apache.org%3E
>     >     > > > > >
>     >     > > > > >
>     >     > > > >
>     >     > > >
>     >     > >
>     >     >
>     >
>     >
>     >
>
>
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [DISCUSS] Early, voluntary relocation to GitBox

Aldrin Piri
Hey folks,

The JIRA ticket has been submitted [1].  I will keep this thread updated as
things progress and then generate a separate "helper" email for
instructions/any updates that may be needed upon completion.

[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-17419

On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 10:51 AM Pierre Villard <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> +1 as well, should ease the contribution workflow.
> Thanks for volunteering Aldrin.
>
> Le lun. 10 déc. 2018 à 16:41, Laszlo Horvath <[hidden email]> a
> écrit :
>
> > +1
> >
> > On 10/12/2018, 15:22, "Michael Moser" <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> >     +1 from me, sounds great.
> >
> >
> >     On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 4:07 AM Arpad Boda <[hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >     > +1 (for being the guinea pig __ )
> >     >
> >     > On 09/12/2018, 04:01, "Aldrin Piri" <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >     >
> >     >     Thanks to those of you that responded.
> >     >
> >     >     I think my tentative plan is to give this a few more days to
> see
> > if
> >     > there
> >     >     are any strong objections.  Otherwise, I'll look to file the
> > ticket
> >     > around
> >     >     midweek and then look to begin the process toward the end of
> > next week
> >     > to
> >     >     hopefully minimize disruptions.  Thanks again!
> >     >
> >     >     On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 12:09 PM Tony Kurc <[hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> >     >
> >     >     > +1, sounds like a great idea
> >     >     >
> >     >     > On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 7:44 AM Mike Thomsen <
> > [hidden email]>
> >     >     > wrote:
> >     >     >
> >     >     > > +1
> >     >     > >
> >     >     > > On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 9:08 PM Sivaprasanna <
> >     > [hidden email]>
> >     >     > > wrote:
> >     >     > >
> >     >     > > > +1 (non-binding)
> >     >     > > >
> >     >     > > > I’m in. Thanks for doing it, Aldrin.
> >     >     > > >
> >     >     > > >
> >     >     > > > On Sat, 8 Dec 2018 at 7:32 AM, James Wing <
> > [hidden email]>
> >     > wrote:
> >     >     > > >
> >     >     > > > > +1, thanks for volunteering.
> >     >     > > > >
> >     >     > > > > > On Dec 7, 2018, at 13:39, Kevin Doran <
> >     > [hidden email]>
> >     >     > > wrote:
> >     >     > > > > >
> >     >     > > > > > +1
> >     >     > > > > >
> >     >     > > > > > On 12/7/18, 15:17, "Andy LoPresto" <
> > [hidden email]>
> >     > wrote:
> >     >     > > > > >
> >     >     > > > > >    +1.
> >     >     > > > > >
> >     >     > > > > >    Andy LoPresto
> >     >     > > > > >    [hidden email]
> >     >     > > > > >    [hidden email]
> >     >     > > > > >    PGP Fingerprint: 70EC B3E5 98A6 5A3F D3C4  BACE
> > 3C6E F65B
> >     > 2F7D
> >     >     > > EF69
> >     >     > > > > >
> >     >     > > > > >> On Dec 7, 2018, at 11:11 AM, Aldrin Piri <
> >     > [hidden email]>
> >     >     > > > wrote:
> >     >     > > > > >>
> >     >     > > > > >> Hey folks,
> >     >     > > > > >>
> >     >     > > > > >> Daniel Gruno sent an email to the dev list about the
> >     > deprecation
> >     >     > of
> >     >     > > > our
> >     >     > > > > >> git-wip repositories [1] (these are the canonical
> > repos that
> >     >     > > > committers
> >     >     > > > > >> push changes to and are currently mirrored to
> GitHub)
> > and
> >     >     > > > transitioning
> >     >     > > > > to
> >     >     > > > > >> GitBox [2].
> >     >     > > > > >>
> >     >     > > > > >> As highlighted in that email, this will not be an
> > optional
> >     > change,
> >     >     > > > only
> >     >     > > > > in
> >     >     > > > > >> when and how it happens.  There was a previous
> > discussion
> >     > over
> >     >     > this
> >     >     > > > > topic
> >     >     > > > > >> [3] where it was generally well received but I think
> > some
> >     > of the
> >     >     > > > > logistics
> >     >     > > > > >> were never mapped out and thus the actual request to
> > do so
> >     > was
> >     >     > never
> >     >     > > > > >> executed.
> >     >     > > > > >>
> >     >     > > > > >> I am proposing we volunteer for the early
> > relocation.  The
> >     > process
> >     >     > > > > looks to
> >     >     > > > > >> be fairly straightforward and should ultimately only
> > result
> >     > in
> >     >     > > > requiring
> >     >     > > > > >> our contributors to add/replace their original
> > git-wip based
> >     >     > > remotes.
> >     >     > > > > >>
> >     >     > > > > >> If folks are in favor, I am happy to file the
> > requisite
> >     > INFRA
> >     >     > ticket
> >     >     > > > and
> >     >     > > > > >> provide the associated communication/docs to the
> > community
> >     > to make
> >     >     > > > this
> >     >     > > > > >> happen.  Again, this is only about making the choice
> > to
> >     > perform
> >     >     > this
> >     >     > > > > >> migration now, in a coordinated manner, in lieu of
> > the mass
> >     >     > > migration
> >     >     > > > > that
> >     >     > > > > >> would happen later.
> >     >     > > > > >>
> >     >     > > > > >> From a project management standpoint, I think it is
> a
> > nice
> >     > bit of
> >     >     > > > > >> functionality that lets us better curate our open
> PRs
> > and,
> >     > given
> >     >     > my
> >     >     > > > > prior
> >     >     > > > > >> interest in the subject, would like to see it
> happen.
> >     >     > > > > >>
> >     >     > > > > >> --aldrin
> >     >     > > > > >>
> >     >     > > > > >> [1]
> >     >     > > > > >>
> >     >     > > > >
> >     >     > > >
> >     >     > >
> >     >     >
> >     >
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/8247bb17671d6131b1d7a646b4c018b21aac390c4f627d8fb1f421b2@%3Cdev.nifi.apache.org%3E
> >     >     > > > > >> [2] https://gitbox.apache.org/
> >     >     > > > > >> [3]
> >     >     > > > > >>
> >     >     > > > >
> >     >     > > >
> >     >     > >
> >     >     >
> >     >
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/de5e103994f356b1b8a572410938eef44af8cb352210e35305c04bc9@%3Cdev.nifi.apache.org%3E
> >     >     > > > > >
> >     >     > > > > >
> >     >     > > > >
> >     >     > > >
> >     >     > >
> >     >     >
> >     >
> >     >
> >     >
> >
> >
> >
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [DISCUSS] Early, voluntary relocation to GitBox

Aldrin Piri
Hey all,

Just a quick note that migration has completed.  I'll be gathering up
information shortly and sending out another, separate email to the
community with any needed changes and will work to update our docs
appropriately.

Committers, you should have received an email regarding you addition to the
nifi group on GitHub.

--aldrin

On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 1:20 PM Aldrin Piri <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hey folks,
>
> The JIRA ticket has been submitted [1].  I will keep this thread updated
> as things progress and then generate a separate "helper" email for
> instructions/any updates that may be needed upon completion.
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-17419
>
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 10:51 AM Pierre Villard <
> [hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> +1 as well, should ease the contribution workflow.
>> Thanks for volunteering Aldrin.
>>
>> Le lun. 10 déc. 2018 à 16:41, Laszlo Horvath <[hidden email]> a
>> écrit :
>>
>> > +1
>> >
>> > On 10/12/2018, 15:22, "Michael Moser" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> >
>> >     +1 from me, sounds great.
>> >
>> >
>> >     On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 4:07 AM Arpad Boda <[hidden email]>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >     > +1 (for being the guinea pig __ )
>> >     >
>> >     > On 09/12/2018, 04:01, "Aldrin Piri" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> >     >
>> >     >     Thanks to those of you that responded.
>> >     >
>> >     >     I think my tentative plan is to give this a few more days to
>> see
>> > if
>> >     > there
>> >     >     are any strong objections.  Otherwise, I'll look to file the
>> > ticket
>> >     > around
>> >     >     midweek and then look to begin the process toward the end of
>> > next week
>> >     > to
>> >     >     hopefully minimize disruptions.  Thanks again!
>> >     >
>> >     >     On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 12:09 PM Tony Kurc <[hidden email]>
>> > wrote:
>> >     >
>> >     >     > +1, sounds like a great idea
>> >     >     >
>> >     >     > On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 7:44 AM Mike Thomsen <
>> > [hidden email]>
>> >     >     > wrote:
>> >     >     >
>> >     >     > > +1
>> >     >     > >
>> >     >     > > On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 9:08 PM Sivaprasanna <
>> >     > [hidden email]>
>> >     >     > > wrote:
>> >     >     > >
>> >     >     > > > +1 (non-binding)
>> >     >     > > >
>> >     >     > > > I’m in. Thanks for doing it, Aldrin.
>> >     >     > > >
>> >     >     > > >
>> >     >     > > > On Sat, 8 Dec 2018 at 7:32 AM, James Wing <
>> > [hidden email]>
>> >     > wrote:
>> >     >     > > >
>> >     >     > > > > +1, thanks for volunteering.
>> >     >     > > > >
>> >     >     > > > > > On Dec 7, 2018, at 13:39, Kevin Doran <
>> >     > [hidden email]>
>> >     >     > > wrote:
>> >     >     > > > > >
>> >     >     > > > > > +1
>> >     >     > > > > >
>> >     >     > > > > > On 12/7/18, 15:17, "Andy LoPresto" <
>> > [hidden email]>
>> >     > wrote:
>> >     >     > > > > >
>> >     >     > > > > >    +1.
>> >     >     > > > > >
>> >     >     > > > > >    Andy LoPresto
>> >     >     > > > > >    [hidden email]
>> >     >     > > > > >    [hidden email]
>> >     >     > > > > >    PGP Fingerprint: 70EC B3E5 98A6 5A3F D3C4  BACE
>> > 3C6E F65B
>> >     > 2F7D
>> >     >     > > EF69
>> >     >     > > > > >
>> >     >     > > > > >> On Dec 7, 2018, at 11:11 AM, Aldrin Piri <
>> >     > [hidden email]>
>> >     >     > > > wrote:
>> >     >     > > > > >>
>> >     >     > > > > >> Hey folks,
>> >     >     > > > > >>
>> >     >     > > > > >> Daniel Gruno sent an email to the dev list about
>> the
>> >     > deprecation
>> >     >     > of
>> >     >     > > > our
>> >     >     > > > > >> git-wip repositories [1] (these are the canonical
>> > repos that
>> >     >     > > > committers
>> >     >     > > > > >> push changes to and are currently mirrored to
>> GitHub)
>> > and
>> >     >     > > > transitioning
>> >     >     > > > > to
>> >     >     > > > > >> GitBox [2].
>> >     >     > > > > >>
>> >     >     > > > > >> As highlighted in that email, this will not be an
>> > optional
>> >     > change,
>> >     >     > > > only
>> >     >     > > > > in
>> >     >     > > > > >> when and how it happens.  There was a previous
>> > discussion
>> >     > over
>> >     >     > this
>> >     >     > > > > topic
>> >     >     > > > > >> [3] where it was generally well received but I
>> think
>> > some
>> >     > of the
>> >     >     > > > > logistics
>> >     >     > > > > >> were never mapped out and thus the actual request
>> to
>> > do so
>> >     > was
>> >     >     > never
>> >     >     > > > > >> executed.
>> >     >     > > > > >>
>> >     >     > > > > >> I am proposing we volunteer for the early
>> > relocation.  The
>> >     > process
>> >     >     > > > > looks to
>> >     >     > > > > >> be fairly straightforward and should ultimately
>> only
>> > result
>> >     > in
>> >     >     > > > requiring
>> >     >     > > > > >> our contributors to add/replace their original
>> > git-wip based
>> >     >     > > remotes.
>> >     >     > > > > >>
>> >     >     > > > > >> If folks are in favor, I am happy to file the
>> > requisite
>> >     > INFRA
>> >     >     > ticket
>> >     >     > > > and
>> >     >     > > > > >> provide the associated communication/docs to the
>> > community
>> >     > to make
>> >     >     > > > this
>> >     >     > > > > >> happen.  Again, this is only about making the
>> choice
>> > to
>> >     > perform
>> >     >     > this
>> >     >     > > > > >> migration now, in a coordinated manner, in lieu of
>> > the mass
>> >     >     > > migration
>> >     >     > > > > that
>> >     >     > > > > >> would happen later.
>> >     >     > > > > >>
>> >     >     > > > > >> From a project management standpoint, I think it
>> is a
>> > nice
>> >     > bit of
>> >     >     > > > > >> functionality that lets us better curate our open
>> PRs
>> > and,
>> >     > given
>> >     >     > my
>> >     >     > > > > prior
>> >     >     > > > > >> interest in the subject, would like to see it
>> happen.
>> >     >     > > > > >>
>> >     >     > > > > >> --aldrin
>> >     >     > > > > >>
>> >     >     > > > > >> [1]
>> >     >     > > > > >>
>> >     >     > > > >
>> >     >     > > >
>> >     >     > >
>> >     >     >
>> >     >
>> >
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/8247bb17671d6131b1d7a646b4c018b21aac390c4f627d8fb1f421b2@%3Cdev.nifi.apache.org%3E
>> >     >     > > > > >> [2] https://gitbox.apache.org/
>> >     >     > > > > >> [3]
>> >     >     > > > > >>
>> >     >     > > > >
>> >     >     > > >
>> >     >     > >
>> >     >     >
>> >     >
>> >
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/de5e103994f356b1b8a572410938eef44af8cb352210e35305c04bc9@%3Cdev.nifi.apache.org%3E
>> >     >     > > > > >
>> >     >     > > > > >
>> >     >     > > > >
>> >     >     > > >
>> >     >     > >
>> >     >     >
>> >     >
>> >     >
>> >     >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [DISCUSS] Early, voluntary relocation to GitBox

Aldrin Piri
Some clarifying notes until I can get all the updates into place and
generate a new email.

There are now two locations that are writable by committers for each of our
repositories.  The updated repository locations can be seen in the Apache
NiFi section of https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf.  NiFi, for instance,
is available at https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/nifi-site.git.  The web
view of the repository is located at
https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=nifi-site.git.  Please note the
subtle distinction!

If you are a contributor still on their way to committership or you are
committer content with the same functionality we had with our old setup
(git-wip), you will use the above listed locations.  You can update your
location by performing the following steps:

   - Go to the root of your source directory, we'll use nifi as an example
      - cd ${repo_home}/nifi
   - Update your remote.  On a default checkout this will be origin, but
   use the name that is pointing to the old git-wip location (you can view
   these using git remote -v)
      - git remote set-url origin
      https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/nifi.git


If you are a committer and interested in making use of the tighter GitHub
integration, there are a few steps needed to enable this described at
https://gitbox.apache.org/setup/.  Please follow those and give some time
to allow the background processes sync.  Successfully completing them
should result in the email from GitHub on behalf of Gitbox I mentioned
previously.

Again, look for a bit more polished set of instructions in the next hour or
so but feel free to add any questions here in the interim if it is holding
you up.



On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 7:35 AM Aldrin Piri <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hey all,
>
> Just a quick note that migration has completed.  I'll be gathering up
> information shortly and sending out another, separate email to the
> community with any needed changes and will work to update our docs
> appropriately.
>
> Committers, you should have received an email regarding you addition to
> the nifi group on GitHub.
>
> --aldrin
>
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 1:20 PM Aldrin Piri <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> Hey folks,
>>
>> The JIRA ticket has been submitted [1].  I will keep this thread updated
>> as things progress and then generate a separate "helper" email for
>> instructions/any updates that may be needed upon completion.
>>
>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-17419
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 10:51 AM Pierre Villard <
>> [hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 as well, should ease the contribution workflow.
>>> Thanks for volunteering Aldrin.
>>>
>>> Le lun. 10 déc. 2018 à 16:41, Laszlo Horvath <[hidden email]>
>>> a
>>> écrit :
>>>
>>> > +1
>>> >
>>> > On 10/12/2018, 15:22, "Michael Moser" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >     +1 from me, sounds great.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >     On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 4:07 AM Arpad Boda <[hidden email]>
>>> > wrote:
>>> >
>>> >     > +1 (for being the guinea pig __ )
>>> >     >
>>> >     > On 09/12/2018, 04:01, "Aldrin Piri" <[hidden email]>
>>> wrote:
>>> >     >
>>> >     >     Thanks to those of you that responded.
>>> >     >
>>> >     >     I think my tentative plan is to give this a few more days to
>>> see
>>> > if
>>> >     > there
>>> >     >     are any strong objections.  Otherwise, I'll look to file the
>>> > ticket
>>> >     > around
>>> >     >     midweek and then look to begin the process toward the end of
>>> > next week
>>> >     > to
>>> >     >     hopefully minimize disruptions.  Thanks again!
>>> >     >
>>> >     >     On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 12:09 PM Tony Kurc <[hidden email]>
>>> > wrote:
>>> >     >
>>> >     >     > +1, sounds like a great idea
>>> >     >     >
>>> >     >     > On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 7:44 AM Mike Thomsen <
>>> > [hidden email]>
>>> >     >     > wrote:
>>> >     >     >
>>> >     >     > > +1
>>> >     >     > >
>>> >     >     > > On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 9:08 PM Sivaprasanna <
>>> >     > [hidden email]>
>>> >     >     > > wrote:
>>> >     >     > >
>>> >     >     > > > +1 (non-binding)
>>> >     >     > > >
>>> >     >     > > > I’m in. Thanks for doing it, Aldrin.
>>> >     >     > > >
>>> >     >     > > >
>>> >     >     > > > On Sat, 8 Dec 2018 at 7:32 AM, James Wing <
>>> > [hidden email]>
>>> >     > wrote:
>>> >     >     > > >
>>> >     >     > > > > +1, thanks for volunteering.
>>> >     >     > > > >
>>> >     >     > > > > > On Dec 7, 2018, at 13:39, Kevin Doran <
>>> >     > [hidden email]>
>>> >     >     > > wrote:
>>> >     >     > > > > >
>>> >     >     > > > > > +1
>>> >     >     > > > > >
>>> >     >     > > > > > On 12/7/18, 15:17, "Andy LoPresto" <
>>> > [hidden email]>
>>> >     > wrote:
>>> >     >     > > > > >
>>> >     >     > > > > >    +1.
>>> >     >     > > > > >
>>> >     >     > > > > >    Andy LoPresto
>>> >     >     > > > > >    [hidden email]
>>> >     >     > > > > >    [hidden email]
>>> >     >     > > > > >    PGP Fingerprint: 70EC B3E5 98A6 5A3F D3C4  BACE
>>> > 3C6E F65B
>>> >     > 2F7D
>>> >     >     > > EF69
>>> >     >     > > > > >
>>> >     >     > > > > >> On Dec 7, 2018, at 11:11 AM, Aldrin Piri <
>>> >     > [hidden email]>
>>> >     >     > > > wrote:
>>> >     >     > > > > >>
>>> >     >     > > > > >> Hey folks,
>>> >     >     > > > > >>
>>> >     >     > > > > >> Daniel Gruno sent an email to the dev list about
>>> the
>>> >     > deprecation
>>> >     >     > of
>>> >     >     > > > our
>>> >     >     > > > > >> git-wip repositories [1] (these are the canonical
>>> > repos that
>>> >     >     > > > committers
>>> >     >     > > > > >> push changes to and are currently mirrored to
>>> GitHub)
>>> > and
>>> >     >     > > > transitioning
>>> >     >     > > > > to
>>> >     >     > > > > >> GitBox [2].
>>> >     >     > > > > >>
>>> >     >     > > > > >> As highlighted in that email, this will not be an
>>> > optional
>>> >     > change,
>>> >     >     > > > only
>>> >     >     > > > > in
>>> >     >     > > > > >> when and how it happens.  There was a previous
>>> > discussion
>>> >     > over
>>> >     >     > this
>>> >     >     > > > > topic
>>> >     >     > > > > >> [3] where it was generally well received but I
>>> think
>>> > some
>>> >     > of the
>>> >     >     > > > > logistics
>>> >     >     > > > > >> were never mapped out and thus the actual request
>>> to
>>> > do so
>>> >     > was
>>> >     >     > never
>>> >     >     > > > > >> executed.
>>> >     >     > > > > >>
>>> >     >     > > > > >> I am proposing we volunteer for the early
>>> > relocation.  The
>>> >     > process
>>> >     >     > > > > looks to
>>> >     >     > > > > >> be fairly straightforward and should ultimately
>>> only
>>> > result
>>> >     > in
>>> >     >     > > > requiring
>>> >     >     > > > > >> our contributors to add/replace their original
>>> > git-wip based
>>> >     >     > > remotes.
>>> >     >     > > > > >>
>>> >     >     > > > > >> If folks are in favor, I am happy to file the
>>> > requisite
>>> >     > INFRA
>>> >     >     > ticket
>>> >     >     > > > and
>>> >     >     > > > > >> provide the associated communication/docs to the
>>> > community
>>> >     > to make
>>> >     >     > > > this
>>> >     >     > > > > >> happen.  Again, this is only about making the
>>> choice
>>> > to
>>> >     > perform
>>> >     >     > this
>>> >     >     > > > > >> migration now, in a coordinated manner, in lieu of
>>> > the mass
>>> >     >     > > migration
>>> >     >     > > > > that
>>> >     >     > > > > >> would happen later.
>>> >     >     > > > > >>
>>> >     >     > > > > >> From a project management standpoint, I think it
>>> is a
>>> > nice
>>> >     > bit of
>>> >     >     > > > > >> functionality that lets us better curate our open
>>> PRs
>>> > and,
>>> >     > given
>>> >     >     > my
>>> >     >     > > > > prior
>>> >     >     > > > > >> interest in the subject, would like to see it
>>> happen.
>>> >     >     > > > > >>
>>> >     >     > > > > >> --aldrin
>>> >     >     > > > > >>
>>> >     >     > > > > >> [1]
>>> >     >     > > > > >>
>>> >     >     > > > >
>>> >     >     > > >
>>> >     >     > >
>>> >     >     >
>>> >     >
>>> >
>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/8247bb17671d6131b1d7a646b4c018b21aac390c4f627d8fb1f421b2@%3Cdev.nifi.apache.org%3E
>>> >     >     > > > > >> [2] https://gitbox.apache.org/
>>> >     >     > > > > >> [3]
>>> >     >     > > > > >>
>>> >     >     > > > >
>>> >     >     > > >
>>> >     >     > >
>>> >     >     >
>>> >     >
>>> >
>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/de5e103994f356b1b8a572410938eef44af8cb352210e35305c04bc9@%3Cdev.nifi.apache.org%3E
>>> >     >     > > > > >
>>> >     >     > > > > >
>>> >     >     > > > >
>>> >     >     > > >
>>> >     >     > >
>>> >     >     >
>>> >     >
>>> >     >
>>> >     >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [DISCUSS] Early, voluntary relocation to GitBox

Aldrin Piri
And in my frenzied typing, I made use of nifi-site's locations instead of
NiFi.

NiFi is available at Gitbox for checkout at
https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/nifi.git with its web view at
https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=nifi.git

On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 8:23 AM Aldrin Piri <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Some clarifying notes until I can get all the updates into place and
> generate a new email.
>
> There are now two locations that are writable by committers for each of
> our repositories.  The updated repository locations can be seen in the
> Apache NiFi section of https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf.  NiFi, for
> instance, is available at
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/nifi-site.git.  The web view of the
> repository is located at
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=nifi-site.git.  Please note the
> subtle distinction!
>
> If you are a contributor still on their way to committership or you are
> committer content with the same functionality we had with our old setup
> (git-wip), you will use the above listed locations.  You can update your
> location by performing the following steps:
>
>    - Go to the root of your source directory, we'll use nifi as an example
>       - cd ${repo_home}/nifi
>    - Update your remote.  On a default checkout this will be origin, but
>    use the name that is pointing to the old git-wip location (you can view
>    these using git remote -v)
>       - git remote set-url origin
>       https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/nifi.git
>
>
> If you are a committer and interested in making use of the tighter GitHub
> integration, there are a few steps needed to enable this described at
> https://gitbox.apache.org/setup/.  Please follow those and give some time
> to allow the background processes sync.  Successfully completing them
> should result in the email from GitHub on behalf of Gitbox I mentioned
> previously.
>
> Again, look for a bit more polished set of instructions in the next hour
> or so but feel free to add any questions here in the interim if it is
> holding you up.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 7:35 AM Aldrin Piri <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> Hey all,
>>
>> Just a quick note that migration has completed.  I'll be gathering up
>> information shortly and sending out another, separate email to the
>> community with any needed changes and will work to update our docs
>> appropriately.
>>
>> Committers, you should have received an email regarding you addition to
>> the nifi group on GitHub.
>>
>> --aldrin
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 1:20 PM Aldrin Piri <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hey folks,
>>>
>>> The JIRA ticket has been submitted [1].  I will keep this thread updated
>>> as things progress and then generate a separate "helper" email for
>>> instructions/any updates that may be needed upon completion.
>>>
>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-17419
>>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 10:51 AM Pierre Villard <
>>> [hidden email]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 as well, should ease the contribution workflow.
>>>> Thanks for volunteering Aldrin.
>>>>
>>>> Le lun. 10 déc. 2018 à 16:41, Laszlo Horvath <[hidden email]>
>>>> a
>>>> écrit :
>>>>
>>>> > +1
>>>> >
>>>> > On 10/12/2018, 15:22, "Michael Moser" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >     +1 from me, sounds great.
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >     On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 4:07 AM Arpad Boda <[hidden email]
>>>> >
>>>> > wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >     > +1 (for being the guinea pig __ )
>>>> >     >
>>>> >     > On 09/12/2018, 04:01, "Aldrin Piri" <[hidden email]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >     >
>>>> >     >     Thanks to those of you that responded.
>>>> >     >
>>>> >     >     I think my tentative plan is to give this a few more days
>>>> to see
>>>> > if
>>>> >     > there
>>>> >     >     are any strong objections.  Otherwise, I'll look to file the
>>>> > ticket
>>>> >     > around
>>>> >     >     midweek and then look to begin the process toward the end of
>>>> > next week
>>>> >     > to
>>>> >     >     hopefully minimize disruptions.  Thanks again!
>>>> >     >
>>>> >     >     On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 12:09 PM Tony Kurc <[hidden email]
>>>> >
>>>> > wrote:
>>>> >     >
>>>> >     >     > +1, sounds like a great idea
>>>> >     >     >
>>>> >     >     > On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 7:44 AM Mike Thomsen <
>>>> > [hidden email]>
>>>> >     >     > wrote:
>>>> >     >     >
>>>> >     >     > > +1
>>>> >     >     > >
>>>> >     >     > > On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 9:08 PM Sivaprasanna <
>>>> >     > [hidden email]>
>>>> >     >     > > wrote:
>>>> >     >     > >
>>>> >     >     > > > +1 (non-binding)
>>>> >     >     > > >
>>>> >     >     > > > I’m in. Thanks for doing it, Aldrin.
>>>> >     >     > > >
>>>> >     >     > > >
>>>> >     >     > > > On Sat, 8 Dec 2018 at 7:32 AM, James Wing <
>>>> > [hidden email]>
>>>> >     > wrote:
>>>> >     >     > > >
>>>> >     >     > > > > +1, thanks for volunteering.
>>>> >     >     > > > >
>>>> >     >     > > > > > On Dec 7, 2018, at 13:39, Kevin Doran <
>>>> >     > [hidden email]>
>>>> >     >     > > wrote:
>>>> >     >     > > > > >
>>>> >     >     > > > > > +1
>>>> >     >     > > > > >
>>>> >     >     > > > > > On 12/7/18, 15:17, "Andy LoPresto" <
>>>> > [hidden email]>
>>>> >     > wrote:
>>>> >     >     > > > > >
>>>> >     >     > > > > >    +1.
>>>> >     >     > > > > >
>>>> >     >     > > > > >    Andy LoPresto
>>>> >     >     > > > > >    [hidden email]
>>>> >     >     > > > > >    [hidden email]
>>>> >     >     > > > > >    PGP Fingerprint: 70EC B3E5 98A6 5A3F D3C4  BACE
>>>> > 3C6E F65B
>>>> >     > 2F7D
>>>> >     >     > > EF69
>>>> >     >     > > > > >
>>>> >     >     > > > > >> On Dec 7, 2018, at 11:11 AM, Aldrin Piri <
>>>> >     > [hidden email]>
>>>> >     >     > > > wrote:
>>>> >     >     > > > > >>
>>>> >     >     > > > > >> Hey folks,
>>>> >     >     > > > > >>
>>>> >     >     > > > > >> Daniel Gruno sent an email to the dev list about
>>>> the
>>>> >     > deprecation
>>>> >     >     > of
>>>> >     >     > > > our
>>>> >     >     > > > > >> git-wip repositories [1] (these are the canonical
>>>> > repos that
>>>> >     >     > > > committers
>>>> >     >     > > > > >> push changes to and are currently mirrored to
>>>> GitHub)
>>>> > and
>>>> >     >     > > > transitioning
>>>> >     >     > > > > to
>>>> >     >     > > > > >> GitBox [2].
>>>> >     >     > > > > >>
>>>> >     >     > > > > >> As highlighted in that email, this will not be an
>>>> > optional
>>>> >     > change,
>>>> >     >     > > > only
>>>> >     >     > > > > in
>>>> >     >     > > > > >> when and how it happens.  There was a previous
>>>> > discussion
>>>> >     > over
>>>> >     >     > this
>>>> >     >     > > > > topic
>>>> >     >     > > > > >> [3] where it was generally well received but I
>>>> think
>>>> > some
>>>> >     > of the
>>>> >     >     > > > > logistics
>>>> >     >     > > > > >> were never mapped out and thus the actual
>>>> request to
>>>> > do so
>>>> >     > was
>>>> >     >     > never
>>>> >     >     > > > > >> executed.
>>>> >     >     > > > > >>
>>>> >     >     > > > > >> I am proposing we volunteer for the early
>>>> > relocation.  The
>>>> >     > process
>>>> >     >     > > > > looks to
>>>> >     >     > > > > >> be fairly straightforward and should ultimately
>>>> only
>>>> > result
>>>> >     > in
>>>> >     >     > > > requiring
>>>> >     >     > > > > >> our contributors to add/replace their original
>>>> > git-wip based
>>>> >     >     > > remotes.
>>>> >     >     > > > > >>
>>>> >     >     > > > > >> If folks are in favor, I am happy to file the
>>>> > requisite
>>>> >     > INFRA
>>>> >     >     > ticket
>>>> >     >     > > > and
>>>> >     >     > > > > >> provide the associated communication/docs to the
>>>> > community
>>>> >     > to make
>>>> >     >     > > > this
>>>> >     >     > > > > >> happen.  Again, this is only about making the
>>>> choice
>>>> > to
>>>> >     > perform
>>>> >     >     > this
>>>> >     >     > > > > >> migration now, in a coordinated manner, in lieu
>>>> of
>>>> > the mass
>>>> >     >     > > migration
>>>> >     >     > > > > that
>>>> >     >     > > > > >> would happen later.
>>>> >     >     > > > > >>
>>>> >     >     > > > > >> From a project management standpoint, I think it
>>>> is a
>>>> > nice
>>>> >     > bit of
>>>> >     >     > > > > >> functionality that lets us better curate our
>>>> open PRs
>>>> > and,
>>>> >     > given
>>>> >     >     > my
>>>> >     >     > > > > prior
>>>> >     >     > > > > >> interest in the subject, would like to see it
>>>> happen.
>>>> >     >     > > > > >>
>>>> >     >     > > > > >> --aldrin
>>>> >     >     > > > > >>
>>>> >     >     > > > > >> [1]
>>>> >     >     > > > > >>
>>>> >     >     > > > >
>>>> >     >     > > >
>>>> >     >     > >
>>>> >     >     >
>>>> >     >
>>>> >
>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/8247bb17671d6131b1d7a646b4c018b21aac390c4f627d8fb1f421b2@%3Cdev.nifi.apache.org%3E
>>>> >     >     > > > > >> [2] https://gitbox.apache.org/
>>>> >     >     > > > > >> [3]
>>>> >     >     > > > > >>
>>>> >     >     > > > >
>>>> >     >     > > >
>>>> >     >     > >
>>>> >     >     >
>>>> >     >
>>>> >
>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/de5e103994f356b1b8a572410938eef44af8cb352210e35305c04bc9@%3Cdev.nifi.apache.org%3E
>>>> >     >     > > > > >
>>>> >     >     > > > > >
>>>> >     >     > > > >
>>>> >     >     > > >
>>>> >     >     > >
>>>> >     >     >
>>>> >     >
>>>> >     >
>>>> >     >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [DISCUSS] Early, voluntary relocation to GitBox

Joe Witt
In reply to this post by Aldrin Piri
Aldrin,

Thanks for coordinating and sharing details.

For others,

Here is the experience I had this AM with this.  You only have to do
the following if you want to be able to work natively in github.  If
you dont care about that part then you can just change from git-wip
urls to gitbox in your git client settings.

My github account name was not linked to my apache account.  I fixed
this at [1] logged in, set it, saved.

My github account was not 2FA enabled.  I know that was dumb so glad
to sort that.  Went to [2] enabled it.  Easy.

I needed to follow the linkage steps ASF requires for gitbox/github
linkages as found here [3].  Got the first checkbox to work.  Got the
second checkbox to work.  The third one I needed to wait.  After maybe
30 mins or so I got an email inviting me to 'asf-committers'. After
accepting that invite I then got several 'added to team' notices for
NiFi and other communities i'm part of.

Once that was all in place I am now able to do cool/native github
things and commit/etc..

[1] https://id.apache.org/
[2] https://github.com/settings/security
[3] https://gitbox.apache.org/setup/
On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 8:24 AM Aldrin Piri <[hidden email]> wrote:

>
> Some clarifying notes until I can get all the updates into place and
> generate a new email.
>
> There are now two locations that are writable by committers for each of our
> repositories.  The updated repository locations can be seen in the Apache
> NiFi section of https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf.  NiFi, for instance,
> is available at https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/nifi-site.git.  The web
> view of the repository is located at
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=nifi-site.git.  Please note the
> subtle distinction!
>
> If you are a contributor still on their way to committership or you are
> committer content with the same functionality we had with our old setup
> (git-wip), you will use the above listed locations.  You can update your
> location by performing the following steps:
>
>    - Go to the root of your source directory, we'll use nifi as an example
>       - cd ${repo_home}/nifi
>    - Update your remote.  On a default checkout this will be origin, but
>    use the name that is pointing to the old git-wip location (you can view
>    these using git remote -v)
>       - git remote set-url origin
>       https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/nifi.git
>
>
> If you are a committer and interested in making use of the tighter GitHub
> integration, there are a few steps needed to enable this described at
> https://gitbox.apache.org/setup/.  Please follow those and give some time
> to allow the background processes sync.  Successfully completing them
> should result in the email from GitHub on behalf of Gitbox I mentioned
> previously.
>
> Again, look for a bit more polished set of instructions in the next hour or
> so but feel free to add any questions here in the interim if it is holding
> you up.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 7:35 AM Aldrin Piri <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> > Hey all,
> >
> > Just a quick note that migration has completed.  I'll be gathering up
> > information shortly and sending out another, separate email to the
> > community with any needed changes and will work to update our docs
> > appropriately.
> >
> > Committers, you should have received an email regarding you addition to
> > the nifi group on GitHub.
> >
> > --aldrin
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 1:20 PM Aldrin Piri <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> >> Hey folks,
> >>
> >> The JIRA ticket has been submitted [1].  I will keep this thread updated
> >> as things progress and then generate a separate "helper" email for
> >> instructions/any updates that may be needed upon completion.
> >>
> >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-17419
> >>
> >> On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 10:51 AM Pierre Villard <
> >> [hidden email]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> +1 as well, should ease the contribution workflow.
> >>> Thanks for volunteering Aldrin.
> >>>
> >>> Le lun. 10 déc. 2018 à 16:41, Laszlo Horvath <[hidden email]>
> >>> a
> >>> écrit :
> >>>
> >>> > +1
> >>> >
> >>> > On 10/12/2018, 15:22, "Michael Moser" <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> >     +1 from me, sounds great.
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >     On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 4:07 AM Arpad Boda <[hidden email]>
> >>> > wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> >     > +1 (for being the guinea pig __ )
> >>> >     >
> >>> >     > On 09/12/2018, 04:01, "Aldrin Piri" <[hidden email]>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> >     >
> >>> >     >     Thanks to those of you that responded.
> >>> >     >
> >>> >     >     I think my tentative plan is to give this a few more days to
> >>> see
> >>> > if
> >>> >     > there
> >>> >     >     are any strong objections.  Otherwise, I'll look to file the
> >>> > ticket
> >>> >     > around
> >>> >     >     midweek and then look to begin the process toward the end of
> >>> > next week
> >>> >     > to
> >>> >     >     hopefully minimize disruptions.  Thanks again!
> >>> >     >
> >>> >     >     On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 12:09 PM Tony Kurc <[hidden email]>
> >>> > wrote:
> >>> >     >
> >>> >     >     > +1, sounds like a great idea
> >>> >     >     >
> >>> >     >     > On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 7:44 AM Mike Thomsen <
> >>> > [hidden email]>
> >>> >     >     > wrote:
> >>> >     >     >
> >>> >     >     > > +1
> >>> >     >     > >
> >>> >     >     > > On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 9:08 PM Sivaprasanna <
> >>> >     > [hidden email]>
> >>> >     >     > > wrote:
> >>> >     >     > >
> >>> >     >     > > > +1 (non-binding)
> >>> >     >     > > >
> >>> >     >     > > > I’m in. Thanks for doing it, Aldrin.
> >>> >     >     > > >
> >>> >     >     > > >
> >>> >     >     > > > On Sat, 8 Dec 2018 at 7:32 AM, James Wing <
> >>> > [hidden email]>
> >>> >     > wrote:
> >>> >     >     > > >
> >>> >     >     > > > > +1, thanks for volunteering.
> >>> >     >     > > > >
> >>> >     >     > > > > > On Dec 7, 2018, at 13:39, Kevin Doran <
> >>> >     > [hidden email]>
> >>> >     >     > > wrote:
> >>> >     >     > > > > >
> >>> >     >     > > > > > +1
> >>> >     >     > > > > >
> >>> >     >     > > > > > On 12/7/18, 15:17, "Andy LoPresto" <
> >>> > [hidden email]>
> >>> >     > wrote:
> >>> >     >     > > > > >
> >>> >     >     > > > > >    +1.
> >>> >     >     > > > > >
> >>> >     >     > > > > >    Andy LoPresto
> >>> >     >     > > > > >    [hidden email]
> >>> >     >     > > > > >    [hidden email]
> >>> >     >     > > > > >    PGP Fingerprint: 70EC B3E5 98A6 5A3F D3C4  BACE
> >>> > 3C6E F65B
> >>> >     > 2F7D
> >>> >     >     > > EF69
> >>> >     >     > > > > >
> >>> >     >     > > > > >> On Dec 7, 2018, at 11:11 AM, Aldrin Piri <
> >>> >     > [hidden email]>
> >>> >     >     > > > wrote:
> >>> >     >     > > > > >>
> >>> >     >     > > > > >> Hey folks,
> >>> >     >     > > > > >>
> >>> >     >     > > > > >> Daniel Gruno sent an email to the dev list about
> >>> the
> >>> >     > deprecation
> >>> >     >     > of
> >>> >     >     > > > our
> >>> >     >     > > > > >> git-wip repositories [1] (these are the canonical
> >>> > repos that
> >>> >     >     > > > committers
> >>> >     >     > > > > >> push changes to and are currently mirrored to
> >>> GitHub)
> >>> > and
> >>> >     >     > > > transitioning
> >>> >     >     > > > > to
> >>> >     >     > > > > >> GitBox [2].
> >>> >     >     > > > > >>
> >>> >     >     > > > > >> As highlighted in that email, this will not be an
> >>> > optional
> >>> >     > change,
> >>> >     >     > > > only
> >>> >     >     > > > > in
> >>> >     >     > > > > >> when and how it happens.  There was a previous
> >>> > discussion
> >>> >     > over
> >>> >     >     > this
> >>> >     >     > > > > topic
> >>> >     >     > > > > >> [3] where it was generally well received but I
> >>> think
> >>> > some
> >>> >     > of the
> >>> >     >     > > > > logistics
> >>> >     >     > > > > >> were never mapped out and thus the actual request
> >>> to
> >>> > do so
> >>> >     > was
> >>> >     >     > never
> >>> >     >     > > > > >> executed.
> >>> >     >     > > > > >>
> >>> >     >     > > > > >> I am proposing we volunteer for the early
> >>> > relocation.  The
> >>> >     > process
> >>> >     >     > > > > looks to
> >>> >     >     > > > > >> be fairly straightforward and should ultimately
> >>> only
> >>> > result
> >>> >     > in
> >>> >     >     > > > requiring
> >>> >     >     > > > > >> our contributors to add/replace their original
> >>> > git-wip based
> >>> >     >     > > remotes.
> >>> >     >     > > > > >>
> >>> >     >     > > > > >> If folks are in favor, I am happy to file the
> >>> > requisite
> >>> >     > INFRA
> >>> >     >     > ticket
> >>> >     >     > > > and
> >>> >     >     > > > > >> provide the associated communication/docs to the
> >>> > community
> >>> >     > to make
> >>> >     >     > > > this
> >>> >     >     > > > > >> happen.  Again, this is only about making the
> >>> choice
> >>> > to
> >>> >     > perform
> >>> >     >     > this
> >>> >     >     > > > > >> migration now, in a coordinated manner, in lieu of
> >>> > the mass
> >>> >     >     > > migration
> >>> >     >     > > > > that
> >>> >     >     > > > > >> would happen later.
> >>> >     >     > > > > >>
> >>> >     >     > > > > >> From a project management standpoint, I think it
> >>> is a
> >>> > nice
> >>> >     > bit of
> >>> >     >     > > > > >> functionality that lets us better curate our open
> >>> PRs
> >>> > and,
> >>> >     > given
> >>> >     >     > my
> >>> >     >     > > > > prior
> >>> >     >     > > > > >> interest in the subject, would like to see it
> >>> happen.
> >>> >     >     > > > > >>
> >>> >     >     > > > > >> --aldrin
> >>> >     >     > > > > >>
> >>> >     >     > > > > >> [1]
> >>> >     >     > > > > >>
> >>> >     >     > > > >
> >>> >     >     > > >
> >>> >     >     > >
> >>> >     >     >
> >>> >     >
> >>> >
> >>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/8247bb17671d6131b1d7a646b4c018b21aac390c4f627d8fb1f421b2@%3Cdev.nifi.apache.org%3E
> >>> >     >     > > > > >> [2] https://gitbox.apache.org/
> >>> >     >     > > > > >> [3]
> >>> >     >     > > > > >>
> >>> >     >     > > > >
> >>> >     >     > > >
> >>> >     >     > >
> >>> >     >     >
> >>> >     >
> >>> >
> >>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/de5e103994f356b1b8a572410938eef44af8cb352210e35305c04bc9@%3Cdev.nifi.apache.org%3E
> >>> >     >     > > > > >
> >>> >     >     > > > > >
> >>> >     >     > > > >
> >>> >     >     > > >
> >>> >     >     > >
> >>> >     >     >
> >>> >     >
> >>> >     >
> >>> >     >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [DISCUSS] Early, voluntary relocation to GitBox

ski n
In reply to this post by Aldrin Piri
Maybe good to check the link on the NiFi website (Development --> Source).
It still points out to "https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=nifi.git"

Raymond

Op vr 14 dec. 2018 om 15:13 schreef Aldrin Piri <[hidden email]>:

> And in my frenzied typing, I made use of nifi-site's locations instead of
> NiFi.
>
> NiFi is available at Gitbox for checkout at
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/nifi.git with its web view at
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=nifi.git
>
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 8:23 AM Aldrin Piri <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> > Some clarifying notes until I can get all the updates into place and
> > generate a new email.
> >
> > There are now two locations that are writable by committers for each of
> > our repositories.  The updated repository locations can be seen in the
> > Apache NiFi section of https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf.  NiFi, for
> > instance, is available at
> > https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/nifi-site.git.  The web view of the
> > repository is located at
> > https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=nifi-site.git.  Please note the
> > subtle distinction!
> >
> > If you are a contributor still on their way to committership or you are
> > committer content with the same functionality we had with our old setup
> > (git-wip), you will use the above listed locations.  You can update your
> > location by performing the following steps:
> >
> >    - Go to the root of your source directory, we'll use nifi as an
> example
> >       - cd ${repo_home}/nifi
> >    - Update your remote.  On a default checkout this will be origin, but
> >    use the name that is pointing to the old git-wip location (you can
> view
> >    these using git remote -v)
> >       - git remote set-url origin
> >       https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/nifi.git
> >
> >
> > If you are a committer and interested in making use of the tighter GitHub
> > integration, there are a few steps needed to enable this described at
> > https://gitbox.apache.org/setup/.  Please follow those and give some
> time
> > to allow the background processes sync.  Successfully completing them
> > should result in the email from GitHub on behalf of Gitbox I mentioned
> > previously.
> >
> > Again, look for a bit more polished set of instructions in the next hour
> > or so but feel free to add any questions here in the interim if it is
> > holding you up.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 7:35 AM Aldrin Piri <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Hey all,
> >>
> >> Just a quick note that migration has completed.  I'll be gathering up
> >> information shortly and sending out another, separate email to the
> >> community with any needed changes and will work to update our docs
> >> appropriately.
> >>
> >> Committers, you should have received an email regarding you addition to
> >> the nifi group on GitHub.
> >>
> >> --aldrin
> >>
> >> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 1:20 PM Aldrin Piri <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hey folks,
> >>>
> >>> The JIRA ticket has been submitted [1].  I will keep this thread
> updated
> >>> as things progress and then generate a separate "helper" email for
> >>> instructions/any updates that may be needed upon completion.
> >>>
> >>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-17419
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 10:51 AM Pierre Villard <
> >>> [hidden email]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> +1 as well, should ease the contribution workflow.
> >>>> Thanks for volunteering Aldrin.
> >>>>
> >>>> Le lun. 10 déc. 2018 à 16:41, Laszlo Horvath <
> [hidden email]>
> >>>> a
> >>>> écrit :
> >>>>
> >>>> > +1
> >>>> >
> >>>> > On 10/12/2018, 15:22, "Michael Moser" <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >>>> >
> >>>> >     +1 from me, sounds great.
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> >     On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 4:07 AM Arpad Boda <
> [hidden email]
> >>>> >
> >>>> > wrote:
> >>>> >
> >>>> >     > +1 (for being the guinea pig __ )
> >>>> >     >
> >>>> >     > On 09/12/2018, 04:01, "Aldrin Piri" <[hidden email]>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>> >     >
> >>>> >     >     Thanks to those of you that responded.
> >>>> >     >
> >>>> >     >     I think my tentative plan is to give this a few more days
> >>>> to see
> >>>> > if
> >>>> >     > there
> >>>> >     >     are any strong objections.  Otherwise, I'll look to file
> the
> >>>> > ticket
> >>>> >     > around
> >>>> >     >     midweek and then look to begin the process toward the end
> of
> >>>> > next week
> >>>> >     > to
> >>>> >     >     hopefully minimize disruptions.  Thanks again!
> >>>> >     >
> >>>> >     >     On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 12:09 PM Tony Kurc <
> [hidden email]
> >>>> >
> >>>> > wrote:
> >>>> >     >
> >>>> >     >     > +1, sounds like a great idea
> >>>> >     >     >
> >>>> >     >     > On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 7:44 AM Mike Thomsen <
> >>>> > [hidden email]>
> >>>> >     >     > wrote:
> >>>> >     >     >
> >>>> >     >     > > +1
> >>>> >     >     > >
> >>>> >     >     > > On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 9:08 PM Sivaprasanna <
> >>>> >     > [hidden email]>
> >>>> >     >     > > wrote:
> >>>> >     >     > >
> >>>> >     >     > > > +1 (non-binding)
> >>>> >     >     > > >
> >>>> >     >     > > > I’m in. Thanks for doing it, Aldrin.
> >>>> >     >     > > >
> >>>> >     >     > > >
> >>>> >     >     > > > On Sat, 8 Dec 2018 at 7:32 AM, James Wing <
> >>>> > [hidden email]>
> >>>> >     > wrote:
> >>>> >     >     > > >
> >>>> >     >     > > > > +1, thanks for volunteering.
> >>>> >     >     > > > >
> >>>> >     >     > > > > > On Dec 7, 2018, at 13:39, Kevin Doran <
> >>>> >     > [hidden email]>
> >>>> >     >     > > wrote:
> >>>> >     >     > > > > >
> >>>> >     >     > > > > > +1
> >>>> >     >     > > > > >
> >>>> >     >     > > > > > On 12/7/18, 15:17, "Andy LoPresto" <
> >>>> > [hidden email]>
> >>>> >     > wrote:
> >>>> >     >     > > > > >
> >>>> >     >     > > > > >    +1.
> >>>> >     >     > > > > >
> >>>> >     >     > > > > >    Andy LoPresto
> >>>> >     >     > > > > >    [hidden email]
> >>>> >     >     > > > > >    [hidden email]
> >>>> >     >     > > > > >    PGP Fingerprint: 70EC B3E5 98A6 5A3F D3C4
> BACE
> >>>> > 3C6E F65B
> >>>> >     > 2F7D
> >>>> >     >     > > EF69
> >>>> >     >     > > > > >
> >>>> >     >     > > > > >> On Dec 7, 2018, at 11:11 AM, Aldrin Piri <
> >>>> >     > [hidden email]>
> >>>> >     >     > > > wrote:
> >>>> >     >     > > > > >>
> >>>> >     >     > > > > >> Hey folks,
> >>>> >     >     > > > > >>
> >>>> >     >     > > > > >> Daniel Gruno sent an email to the dev list
> about
> >>>> the
> >>>> >     > deprecation
> >>>> >     >     > of
> >>>> >     >     > > > our
> >>>> >     >     > > > > >> git-wip repositories [1] (these are the
> canonical
> >>>> > repos that
> >>>> >     >     > > > committers
> >>>> >     >     > > > > >> push changes to and are currently mirrored to
> >>>> GitHub)
> >>>> > and
> >>>> >     >     > > > transitioning
> >>>> >     >     > > > > to
> >>>> >     >     > > > > >> GitBox [2].
> >>>> >     >     > > > > >>
> >>>> >     >     > > > > >> As highlighted in that email, this will not be
> an
> >>>> > optional
> >>>> >     > change,
> >>>> >     >     > > > only
> >>>> >     >     > > > > in
> >>>> >     >     > > > > >> when and how it happens.  There was a previous
> >>>> > discussion
> >>>> >     > over
> >>>> >     >     > this
> >>>> >     >     > > > > topic
> >>>> >     >     > > > > >> [3] where it was generally well received but I
> >>>> think
> >>>> > some
> >>>> >     > of the
> >>>> >     >     > > > > logistics
> >>>> >     >     > > > > >> were never mapped out and thus the actual
> >>>> request to
> >>>> > do so
> >>>> >     > was
> >>>> >     >     > never
> >>>> >     >     > > > > >> executed.
> >>>> >     >     > > > > >>
> >>>> >     >     > > > > >> I am proposing we volunteer for the early
> >>>> > relocation.  The
> >>>> >     > process
> >>>> >     >     > > > > looks to
> >>>> >     >     > > > > >> be fairly straightforward and should ultimately
> >>>> only
> >>>> > result
> >>>> >     > in
> >>>> >     >     > > > requiring
> >>>> >     >     > > > > >> our contributors to add/replace their original
> >>>> > git-wip based
> >>>> >     >     > > remotes.
> >>>> >     >     > > > > >>
> >>>> >     >     > > > > >> If folks are in favor, I am happy to file the
> >>>> > requisite
> >>>> >     > INFRA
> >>>> >     >     > ticket
> >>>> >     >     > > > and
> >>>> >     >     > > > > >> provide the associated communication/docs to
> the
> >>>> > community
> >>>> >     > to make
> >>>> >     >     > > > this
> >>>> >     >     > > > > >> happen.  Again, this is only about making the
> >>>> choice
> >>>> > to
> >>>> >     > perform
> >>>> >     >     > this
> >>>> >     >     > > > > >> migration now, in a coordinated manner, in lieu
> >>>> of
> >>>> > the mass
> >>>> >     >     > > migration
> >>>> >     >     > > > > that
> >>>> >     >     > > > > >> would happen later.
> >>>> >     >     > > > > >>
> >>>> >     >     > > > > >> From a project management standpoint, I think
> it
> >>>> is a
> >>>> > nice
> >>>> >     > bit of
> >>>> >     >     > > > > >> functionality that lets us better curate our
> >>>> open PRs
> >>>> > and,
> >>>> >     > given
> >>>> >     >     > my
> >>>> >     >     > > > > prior
> >>>> >     >     > > > > >> interest in the subject, would like to see it
> >>>> happen.
> >>>> >     >     > > > > >>
> >>>> >     >     > > > > >> --aldrin
> >>>> >     >     > > > > >>
> >>>> >     >     > > > > >> [1]
> >>>> >     >     > > > > >>
> >>>> >     >     > > > >
> >>>> >     >     > > >
> >>>> >     >     > >
> >>>> >     >     >
> >>>> >     >
> >>>> >
> >>>>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/8247bb17671d6131b1d7a646b4c018b21aac390c4f627d8fb1f421b2@%3Cdev.nifi.apache.org%3E
> >>>> >     >     > > > > >> [2] https://gitbox.apache.org/
> >>>> >     >     > > > > >> [3]
> >>>> >     >     > > > > >>
> >>>> >     >     > > > >
> >>>> >     >     > > >
> >>>> >     >     > >
> >>>> >     >     >
> >>>> >     >
> >>>> >
> >>>>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/de5e103994f356b1b8a572410938eef44af8cb352210e35305c04bc9@%3Cdev.nifi.apache.org%3E
> >>>> >     >     > > > > >
> >>>> >     >     > > > > >
> >>>> >     >     > > > >
> >>>> >     >     > > >
> >>>> >     >     > >
> >>>> >     >     >
> >>>> >     >
> >>>> >     >
> >>>> >     >
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>>
> >>>
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [DISCUSS] Early, voluntary relocation to GitBox

Aldrin Piri
Hi Raymond,

Thanks for calling that out.  I am in the process of updating/deploying the
site as well as a final email with all the details but will be sure to
cover those links.

Thanks!
--aldrin

On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 10:37 AM ski n <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Maybe good to check the link on the NiFi website (Development --> Source).
> It still points out to "https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=nifi.git
> "
>
> Raymond
>
> Op vr 14 dec. 2018 om 15:13 schreef Aldrin Piri <[hidden email]>:
>
> > And in my frenzied typing, I made use of nifi-site's locations instead of
> > NiFi.
> >
> > NiFi is available at Gitbox for checkout at
> > https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/nifi.git with its web view at
> > https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=nifi.git
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 8:23 AM Aldrin Piri <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Some clarifying notes until I can get all the updates into place and
> > > generate a new email.
> > >
> > > There are now two locations that are writable by committers for each of
> > > our repositories.  The updated repository locations can be seen in the
> > > Apache NiFi section of https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf.  NiFi, for
> > > instance, is available at
> > > https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/nifi-site.git.  The web view of
> the
> > > repository is located at
> > > https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=nifi-site.git.  Please note the
> > > subtle distinction!
> > >
> > > If you are a contributor still on their way to committership or you are
> > > committer content with the same functionality we had with our old setup
> > > (git-wip), you will use the above listed locations.  You can update
> your
> > > location by performing the following steps:
> > >
> > >    - Go to the root of your source directory, we'll use nifi as an
> > example
> > >       - cd ${repo_home}/nifi
> > >    - Update your remote.  On a default checkout this will be origin,
> but
> > >    use the name that is pointing to the old git-wip location (you can
> > view
> > >    these using git remote -v)
> > >       - git remote set-url origin
> > >       https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/nifi.git
> > >
> > >
> > > If you are a committer and interested in making use of the tighter
> GitHub
> > > integration, there are a few steps needed to enable this described at
> > > https://gitbox.apache.org/setup/.  Please follow those and give some
> > time
> > > to allow the background processes sync.  Successfully completing them
> > > should result in the email from GitHub on behalf of Gitbox I mentioned
> > > previously.
> > >
> > > Again, look for a bit more polished set of instructions in the next
> hour
> > > or so but feel free to add any questions here in the interim if it is
> > > holding you up.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 7:35 AM Aldrin Piri <[hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hey all,
> > >>
> > >> Just a quick note that migration has completed.  I'll be gathering up
> > >> information shortly and sending out another, separate email to the
> > >> community with any needed changes and will work to update our docs
> > >> appropriately.
> > >>
> > >> Committers, you should have received an email regarding you addition
> to
> > >> the nifi group on GitHub.
> > >>
> > >> --aldrin
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 1:20 PM Aldrin Piri <[hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Hey folks,
> > >>>
> > >>> The JIRA ticket has been submitted [1].  I will keep this thread
> > updated
> > >>> as things progress and then generate a separate "helper" email for
> > >>> instructions/any updates that may be needed upon completion.
> > >>>
> > >>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-17419
> > >>>
> > >>> On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 10:51 AM Pierre Villard <
> > >>> [hidden email]> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> +1 as well, should ease the contribution workflow.
> > >>>> Thanks for volunteering Aldrin.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Le lun. 10 déc. 2018 à 16:41, Laszlo Horvath <
> > [hidden email]>
> > >>>> a
> > >>>> écrit :
> > >>>>
> > >>>> > +1
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> > On 10/12/2018, 15:22, "Michael Moser" <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> >     +1 from me, sounds great.
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> >     On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 4:07 AM Arpad Boda <
> > [hidden email]
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> > wrote:
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> >     > +1 (for being the guinea pig __ )
> > >>>> >     >
> > >>>> >     > On 09/12/2018, 04:01, "Aldrin Piri" <[hidden email]>
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>> >     >
> > >>>> >     >     Thanks to those of you that responded.
> > >>>> >     >
> > >>>> >     >     I think my tentative plan is to give this a few more
> days
> > >>>> to see
> > >>>> > if
> > >>>> >     > there
> > >>>> >     >     are any strong objections.  Otherwise, I'll look to file
> > the
> > >>>> > ticket
> > >>>> >     > around
> > >>>> >     >     midweek and then look to begin the process toward the
> end
> > of
> > >>>> > next week
> > >>>> >     > to
> > >>>> >     >     hopefully minimize disruptions.  Thanks again!
> > >>>> >     >
> > >>>> >     >     On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 12:09 PM Tony Kurc <
> > [hidden email]
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> > wrote:
> > >>>> >     >
> > >>>> >     >     > +1, sounds like a great idea
> > >>>> >     >     >
> > >>>> >     >     > On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 7:44 AM Mike Thomsen <
> > >>>> > [hidden email]>
> > >>>> >     >     > wrote:
> > >>>> >     >     >
> > >>>> >     >     > > +1
> > >>>> >     >     > >
> > >>>> >     >     > > On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 9:08 PM Sivaprasanna <
> > >>>> >     > [hidden email]>
> > >>>> >     >     > > wrote:
> > >>>> >     >     > >
> > >>>> >     >     > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >>>> >     >     > > >
> > >>>> >     >     > > > I’m in. Thanks for doing it, Aldrin.
> > >>>> >     >     > > >
> > >>>> >     >     > > >
> > >>>> >     >     > > > On Sat, 8 Dec 2018 at 7:32 AM, James Wing <
> > >>>> > [hidden email]>
> > >>>> >     > wrote:
> > >>>> >     >     > > >
> > >>>> >     >     > > > > +1, thanks for volunteering.
> > >>>> >     >     > > > >
> > >>>> >     >     > > > > > On Dec 7, 2018, at 13:39, Kevin Doran <
> > >>>> >     > [hidden email]>
> > >>>> >     >     > > wrote:
> > >>>> >     >     > > > > >
> > >>>> >     >     > > > > > +1
> > >>>> >     >     > > > > >
> > >>>> >     >     > > > > > On 12/7/18, 15:17, "Andy LoPresto" <
> > >>>> > [hidden email]>
> > >>>> >     > wrote:
> > >>>> >     >     > > > > >
> > >>>> >     >     > > > > >    +1.
> > >>>> >     >     > > > > >
> > >>>> >     >     > > > > >    Andy LoPresto
> > >>>> >     >     > > > > >    [hidden email]
> > >>>> >     >     > > > > >    [hidden email]
> > >>>> >     >     > > > > >    PGP Fingerprint: 70EC B3E5 98A6 5A3F D3C4
> > BACE
> > >>>> > 3C6E F65B
> > >>>> >     > 2F7D
> > >>>> >     >     > > EF69
> > >>>> >     >     > > > > >
> > >>>> >     >     > > > > >> On Dec 7, 2018, at 11:11 AM, Aldrin Piri <
> > >>>> >     > [hidden email]>
> > >>>> >     >     > > > wrote:
> > >>>> >     >     > > > > >>
> > >>>> >     >     > > > > >> Hey folks,
> > >>>> >     >     > > > > >>
> > >>>> >     >     > > > > >> Daniel Gruno sent an email to the dev list
> > about
> > >>>> the
> > >>>> >     > deprecation
> > >>>> >     >     > of
> > >>>> >     >     > > > our
> > >>>> >     >     > > > > >> git-wip repositories [1] (these are the
> > canonical
> > >>>> > repos that
> > >>>> >     >     > > > committers
> > >>>> >     >     > > > > >> push changes to and are currently mirrored to
> > >>>> GitHub)
> > >>>> > and
> > >>>> >     >     > > > transitioning
> > >>>> >     >     > > > > to
> > >>>> >     >     > > > > >> GitBox [2].
> > >>>> >     >     > > > > >>
> > >>>> >     >     > > > > >> As highlighted in that email, this will not
> be
> > an
> > >>>> > optional
> > >>>> >     > change,
> > >>>> >     >     > > > only
> > >>>> >     >     > > > > in
> > >>>> >     >     > > > > >> when and how it happens.  There was a
> previous
> > >>>> > discussion
> > >>>> >     > over
> > >>>> >     >     > this
> > >>>> >     >     > > > > topic
> > >>>> >     >     > > > > >> [3] where it was generally well received but
> I
> > >>>> think
> > >>>> > some
> > >>>> >     > of the
> > >>>> >     >     > > > > logistics
> > >>>> >     >     > > > > >> were never mapped out and thus the actual
> > >>>> request to
> > >>>> > do so
> > >>>> >     > was
> > >>>> >     >     > never
> > >>>> >     >     > > > > >> executed.
> > >>>> >     >     > > > > >>
> > >>>> >     >     > > > > >> I am proposing we volunteer for the early
> > >>>> > relocation.  The
> > >>>> >     > process
> > >>>> >     >     > > > > looks to
> > >>>> >     >     > > > > >> be fairly straightforward and should
> ultimately
> > >>>> only
> > >>>> > result
> > >>>> >     > in
> > >>>> >     >     > > > requiring
> > >>>> >     >     > > > > >> our contributors to add/replace their
> original
> > >>>> > git-wip based
> > >>>> >     >     > > remotes.
> > >>>> >     >     > > > > >>
> > >>>> >     >     > > > > >> If folks are in favor, I am happy to file the
> > >>>> > requisite
> > >>>> >     > INFRA
> > >>>> >     >     > ticket
> > >>>> >     >     > > > and
> > >>>> >     >     > > > > >> provide the associated communication/docs to
> > the
> > >>>> > community
> > >>>> >     > to make
> > >>>> >     >     > > > this
> > >>>> >     >     > > > > >> happen.  Again, this is only about making the
> > >>>> choice
> > >>>> > to
> > >>>> >     > perform
> > >>>> >     >     > this
> > >>>> >     >     > > > > >> migration now, in a coordinated manner, in
> lieu
> > >>>> of
> > >>>> > the mass
> > >>>> >     >     > > migration
> > >>>> >     >     > > > > that
> > >>>> >     >     > > > > >> would happen later.
> > >>>> >     >     > > > > >>
> > >>>> >     >     > > > > >> From a project management standpoint, I think
> > it
> > >>>> is a
> > >>>> > nice
> > >>>> >     > bit of
> > >>>> >     >     > > > > >> functionality that lets us better curate our
> > >>>> open PRs
> > >>>> > and,
> > >>>> >     > given
> > >>>> >     >     > my
> > >>>> >     >     > > > > prior
> > >>>> >     >     > > > > >> interest in the subject, would like to see it
> > >>>> happen.
> > >>>> >     >     > > > > >>
> > >>>> >     >     > > > > >> --aldrin
> > >>>> >     >     > > > > >>
> > >>>> >     >     > > > > >> [1]
> > >>>> >     >     > > > > >>
> > >>>> >     >     > > > >
> > >>>> >     >     > > >
> > >>>> >     >     > >
> > >>>> >     >     >
> > >>>> >     >
> > >>>> >
> > >>>>
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/8247bb17671d6131b1d7a646b4c018b21aac390c4f627d8fb1f421b2@%3Cdev.nifi.apache.org%3E
> > >>>> >     >     > > > > >> [2] https://gitbox.apache.org/
> > >>>> >     >     > > > > >> [3]
> > >>>> >     >     > > > > >>
> > >>>> >     >     > > > >
> > >>>> >     >     > > >
> > >>>> >     >     > >
> > >>>> >     >     >
> > >>>> >     >
> > >>>> >
> > >>>>
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/de5e103994f356b1b8a572410938eef44af8cb352210e35305c04bc9@%3Cdev.nifi.apache.org%3E
> > >>>> >     >     > > > > >
> > >>>> >     >     > > > > >
> > >>>> >     >     > > > >
> > >>>> >     >     > > >
> > >>>> >     >     > >
> > >>>> >     >     >
> > >>>> >     >
> > >>>> >     >
> > >>>> >     >
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> >
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> >
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

RE: [EXT] Re: [DISCUSS] Early, voluntary relocation to GitBox

Peter Wicks (pwicks)
In reply to this post by Aldrin Piri
Does closing a PR through GitHub close the JIRA ticket correctly? I'm assuming sign-off is automated this way, but wasn't sure about this step.

Thanks,
  Peter

-----Original Message-----
From: Aldrin Piri [mailto:[hidden email]]
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2018 6:23 AM
To: dev <[hidden email]>
Subject: [EXT] Re: [DISCUSS] Early, voluntary relocation to GitBox

Some clarifying notes until I can get all the updates into place and generate a new email.

There are now two locations that are writable by committers for each of our repositories.  The updated repository locations can be seen in the Apache NiFi section of https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf.  NiFi, for instance, is available at https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/nifi-site.git.  The web view of the repository is located at https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=nifi-site.git.  Please note the subtle distinction!

If you are a contributor still on their way to committership or you are committer content with the same functionality we had with our old setup (git-wip), you will use the above listed locations.  You can update your location by performing the following steps:

   - Go to the root of your source directory, we'll use nifi as an example
      - cd ${repo_home}/nifi
   - Update your remote.  On a default checkout this will be origin, but
   use the name that is pointing to the old git-wip location (you can view
   these using git remote -v)
      - git remote set-url origin
      https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/nifi.git


If you are a committer and interested in making use of the tighter GitHub integration, there are a few steps needed to enable this described at https://gitbox.apache.org/setup/.  Please follow those and give some time to allow the background processes sync.  Successfully completing them should result in the email from GitHub on behalf of Gitbox I mentioned previously.

Again, look for a bit more polished set of instructions in the next hour or so but feel free to add any questions here in the interim if it is holding you up.



On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 7:35 AM Aldrin Piri <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hey all,
>
> Just a quick note that migration has completed.  I'll be gathering up
> information shortly and sending out another, separate email to the
> community with any needed changes and will work to update our docs
> appropriately.
>
> Committers, you should have received an email regarding you addition
> to the nifi group on GitHub.
>
> --aldrin
>
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 1:20 PM Aldrin Piri <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> Hey folks,
>>
>> The JIRA ticket has been submitted [1].  I will keep this thread
>> updated as things progress and then generate a separate "helper"
>> email for instructions/any updates that may be needed upon completion.
>>
>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-17419
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 10:51 AM Pierre Villard <
>> [hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 as well, should ease the contribution workflow.
>>> Thanks for volunteering Aldrin.
>>>
>>> Le lun. 10 déc. 2018 à 16:41, Laszlo Horvath
>>> <[hidden email]> a écrit :
>>>
>>> > +1
>>> >
>>> > On 10/12/2018, 15:22, "Michael Moser" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >     +1 from me, sounds great.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >     On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 4:07 AM Arpad Boda
>>> > <[hidden email]>
>>> > wrote:
>>> >
>>> >     > +1 (for being the guinea pig __ )
>>> >     >
>>> >     > On 09/12/2018, 04:01, "Aldrin Piri" <[hidden email]>
>>> wrote:
>>> >     >
>>> >     >     Thanks to those of you that responded.
>>> >     >
>>> >     >     I think my tentative plan is to give this a few more days to
>>> see
>>> > if
>>> >     > there
>>> >     >     are any strong objections.  Otherwise, I'll look to file the
>>> > ticket
>>> >     > around
>>> >     >     midweek and then look to begin the process toward the end of
>>> > next week
>>> >     > to
>>> >     >     hopefully minimize disruptions.  Thanks again!
>>> >     >
>>> >     >     On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 12:09 PM Tony Kurc <[hidden email]>
>>> > wrote:
>>> >     >
>>> >     >     > +1, sounds like a great idea
>>> >     >     >
>>> >     >     > On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 7:44 AM Mike Thomsen <
>>> > [hidden email]>
>>> >     >     > wrote:
>>> >     >     >
>>> >     >     > > +1
>>> >     >     > >
>>> >     >     > > On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 9:08 PM Sivaprasanna <
>>> >     > [hidden email]>
>>> >     >     > > wrote:
>>> >     >     > >
>>> >     >     > > > +1 (non-binding)
>>> >     >     > > >
>>> >     >     > > > I’m in. Thanks for doing it, Aldrin.
>>> >     >     > > >
>>> >     >     > > >
>>> >     >     > > > On Sat, 8 Dec 2018 at 7:32 AM, James Wing <
>>> > [hidden email]>
>>> >     > wrote:
>>> >     >     > > >
>>> >     >     > > > > +1, thanks for volunteering.
>>> >     >     > > > >
>>> >     >     > > > > > On Dec 7, 2018, at 13:39, Kevin Doran <
>>> >     > [hidden email]>
>>> >     >     > > wrote:
>>> >     >     > > > > >
>>> >     >     > > > > > +1
>>> >     >     > > > > >
>>> >     >     > > > > > On 12/7/18, 15:17, "Andy LoPresto" <
>>> > [hidden email]>
>>> >     > wrote:
>>> >     >     > > > > >
>>> >     >     > > > > >    +1.
>>> >     >     > > > > >
>>> >     >     > > > > >    Andy LoPresto
>>> >     >     > > > > >    [hidden email]
>>> >     >     > > > > >    [hidden email]
>>> >     >     > > > > >    PGP Fingerprint: 70EC B3E5 98A6 5A3F D3C4  BACE
>>> > 3C6E F65B
>>> >     > 2F7D
>>> >     >     > > EF69
>>> >     >     > > > > >
>>> >     >     > > > > >> On Dec 7, 2018, at 11:11 AM, Aldrin Piri <
>>> >     > [hidden email]>
>>> >     >     > > > wrote:
>>> >     >     > > > > >>
>>> >     >     > > > > >> Hey folks,
>>> >     >     > > > > >>
>>> >     >     > > > > >> Daniel Gruno sent an email to the dev list about
>>> the
>>> >     > deprecation
>>> >     >     > of
>>> >     >     > > > our
>>> >     >     > > > > >> git-wip repositories [1] (these are the canonical
>>> > repos that
>>> >     >     > > > committers
>>> >     >     > > > > >> push changes to and are currently mirrored to
>>> GitHub)
>>> > and
>>> >     >     > > > transitioning
>>> >     >     > > > > to
>>> >     >     > > > > >> GitBox [2].
>>> >     >     > > > > >>
>>> >     >     > > > > >> As highlighted in that email, this will not be an
>>> > optional
>>> >     > change,
>>> >     >     > > > only
>>> >     >     > > > > in
>>> >     >     > > > > >> when and how it happens.  There was a previous
>>> > discussion
>>> >     > over
>>> >     >     > this
>>> >     >     > > > > topic
>>> >     >     > > > > >> [3] where it was generally well received but I
>>> think
>>> > some
>>> >     > of the
>>> >     >     > > > > logistics
>>> >     >     > > > > >> were never mapped out and thus the actual request
>>> to
>>> > do so
>>> >     > was
>>> >     >     > never
>>> >     >     > > > > >> executed.
>>> >     >     > > > > >>
>>> >     >     > > > > >> I am proposing we volunteer for the early
>>> > relocation.  The
>>> >     > process
>>> >     >     > > > > looks to
>>> >     >     > > > > >> be fairly straightforward and should ultimately
>>> only
>>> > result
>>> >     > in
>>> >     >     > > > requiring
>>> >     >     > > > > >> our contributors to add/replace their original
>>> > git-wip based
>>> >     >     > > remotes.
>>> >     >     > > > > >>
>>> >     >     > > > > >> If folks are in favor, I am happy to file the
>>> > requisite
>>> >     > INFRA
>>> >     >     > ticket
>>> >     >     > > > and
>>> >     >     > > > > >> provide the associated communication/docs to the
>>> > community
>>> >     > to make
>>> >     >     > > > this
>>> >     >     > > > > >> happen.  Again, this is only about making the
>>> choice
>>> > to
>>> >     > perform
>>> >     >     > this
>>> >     >     > > > > >> migration now, in a coordinated manner, in lieu of
>>> > the mass
>>> >     >     > > migration
>>> >     >     > > > > that
>>> >     >     > > > > >> would happen later.
>>> >     >     > > > > >>
>>> >     >     > > > > >> From a project management standpoint, I think it
>>> is a
>>> > nice
>>> >     > bit of
>>> >     >     > > > > >> functionality that lets us better curate our open
>>> PRs
>>> > and,
>>> >     > given
>>> >     >     > my
>>> >     >     > > > > prior
>>> >     >     > > > > >> interest in the subject, would like to see it
>>> happen.
>>> >     >     > > > > >>
>>> >     >     > > > > >> --aldrin
>>> >     >     > > > > >>
>>> >     >     > > > > >> [1]
>>> >     >     > > > > >>
>>> >     >     > > > >
>>> >     >     > > >
>>> >     >     > >
>>> >     >     >
>>> >     >
>>> >
>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/8247bb17671d6131b1d7a646b4c018b
>>> 21aac390c4f627d8fb1f421b2@%3Cdev.nifi.apache.org%3E
>>> >     >     > > > > >> [2] https://gitbox.apache.org/
>>> >     >     > > > > >> [3]
>>> >     >     > > > > >>
>>> >     >     > > > >
>>> >     >     > > >
>>> >     >     > >
>>> >     >     >
>>> >     >
>>> >
>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/de5e103994f356b1b8a572410938eef
>>> 44af8cb352210e35305c04bc9@%3Cdev.nifi.apache.org%3E
>>> >     >     > > > > >
>>> >     >     > > > > >
>>> >     >     > > > >
>>> >     >     > > >
>>> >     >     > >
>>> >     >     >
>>> >     >
>>> >     >
>>> >     >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>
12